These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20058983)

  • 1. The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.
    Rodríguez J; Neely ST; Patra H; Kopun J; Jesteadt W; Tan H; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):361-9. PubMed ID: 20058983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Williams EJ; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of broadband and narrowband contralateral noise on psychophysical tuning curves and otoacoustic emissions.
    Wicher A; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):2931-41. PubMed ID: 24815273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal aspects of suppression in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Rodriguez J; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3082-9. PubMed ID: 21568411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Kopun J; Tan H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):801-6. PubMed ID: 21361439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.
    Yasin I; Plack CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 6(4):368-77. PubMed ID: 16261268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.
    Rodríguez J; Neely ST; Jesteadt W; Tan H; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):864-75. PubMed ID: 21361444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold.
    Garinis A; Werner L; Abdala C
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 21878379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-tone suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Sieck NE; Rasetshwane DM; Kopun JG; Jesteadt W; Gorga MP; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2299. PubMed ID: 27250125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evoked otoacoustic emission: behaviour under the forward masking paradigm.
    Kevanishvili Z; Gobsch H; Gvelesiani T; Gamgebeli Z
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 1488243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence that adaptation of suppression cannot account for auditory enhancement or enhanced forward masking.
    Wright BA; McFadden D
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1992 Jun; 336(1278):325-8; discussion 328-9. PubMed ID: 1354371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysical two-tone suppression as a function of input level for f2/f1 greater than 1.0.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1751-63. PubMed ID: 7372930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behaviour of delayed evoked otoacoustic emission under forward masking paradigm.
    Gobsch H; Kevanishvili Z; Gamgebeli Z; Gvelesiani T
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 1439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses.
    Harris DM; Dallos P
    J Neurophysiol; 1979 Jul; 42(4):1083-1107. PubMed ID: 479921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonadditivity of forward and simultaneous masking.
    Svec A; Joshi SN; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2866-75. PubMed ID: 24116423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2149-63. PubMed ID: 19062855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.