These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20058988)

  • 1. On the importance of preserving the harmonics and neighboring partials prior to vocoder processing: implications for cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):427-34. PubMed ID: 20058988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of introducing low-frequency harmonics in the perception of vocoded telephone speech.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1280-9. PubMed ID: 20815463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
    Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3145-53. PubMed ID: 21117763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2272-82. PubMed ID: 19062865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Lutman ME; Ewert SD; Li G; Bleeck S
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.
    Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 15(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 24448721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel VOCODER for cochlear implants.
    Johnson PA; McNamara DM; Ziarani AK
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4732-5. PubMed ID: 19163773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contribution of envelope periodicity to release from speech-on-speech masking.
    Christiansen C; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2197-204. PubMed ID: 23967949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):446-54. PubMed ID: 12880055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3689-95. PubMed ID: 20550267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2417-26. PubMed ID: 16642854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of low-frequency harmonics to Mandarin Chinese tone identification in quiet and six-talker babble background.
    Liu C; Azimi B; Bhandary M; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):428-38. PubMed ID: 24437783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative importance of temporal envelope information for intelligibility prediction: a study on cochlear-implant vocoded speech.
    Chen F
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):1033-8. PubMed ID: 21546304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulse-spreading harmonic complex as an alternative carrier for vocoder simulations of cochlear implants.
    Mesnildrey Q; Hilkhuysen G; Macherey O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):986-91. PubMed ID: 26936577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of companding-based spectral enhancement using simulated cochlear-implant processing.
    Oxenham AJ; Simonson AM; Turicchia L; Sarpeshkar R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1709-16. PubMed ID: 17407907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of envelope-vocoder processing on F0 discrimination and concurrent-vowel identification.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 16230895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.