153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20059587)
1. The longevity of different restorations in primary teeth.
Qvist V; Poulsen A; Teglers PT; Mjör IA
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jan; 20(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20059587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The post-amalgam era: a selection of materials and their longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions.
Forss H; Widström E
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 May; 13(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 12752914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria.
Bektas Donmez S; Uysal S; Dolgun A; Turgut MD
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):202-212. PubMed ID: 27759409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 26161601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fluorides leaching from restorative materials and the effect on adjacent teeth.
Qvist V; Poulsen A; Teglers PT; Mjör IA
Int Dent J; 2010 Jun; 60(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 20684440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 1, baseline data.
Stewardson D; Thornley P; Bigg T; Bromage C; Browne A; Cottam D; Dalby D; Gilmour J; Horton J; Roberts E; Westoby L; Dietrich T; Burke T
Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):E17; discussion 406-7. PubMed ID: 20448583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
Smales RJ; Yip HK
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
