These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20060098)

  • 61. Anxiety sensitivity and risk-taking behavior.
    Broman-Fulks JJ; Urbaniak A; Bondy CL; Toomey KJ
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2014; 27(6):619-32. PubMed ID: 24559488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Anticipatory stress restores decision-making deficits in heavy drinkers by increasing sensitivity to losses.
    Gullo MJ; Stieger AA
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2011 Sep; 117(2-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 21439736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The contingency-shifting variant Iowa Gambling Task: an investigation with young adults.
    Dymond S; Cella M; Cooper A; Turnbull OH
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Mar; 32(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19548165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: what does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions?
    Schiebener J; Zamarian L; Delazer M; Brand M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Nov; 33(9):1025-39. PubMed ID: 22082084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Testosterone shifts the balance between sensitivity for punishment and reward in healthy young women.
    van Honk J; Schutter DJ; Hermans EJ; Putman P; Tuiten A; Koppeschaar H
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2004 Aug; 29(7):937-43. PubMed ID: 15177710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Decision making with and without feedback: the role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles.
    Brand M; Laier C; Pawlikowski M; Markowitsch HJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Nov; 31(8):984-98. PubMed ID: 19358007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Working memory involved in predicting future outcomes based on past experiences.
    Dretsch MN; Tipples J
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Feb; 66(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17628270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparing alternative metrics to assess performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Gansler DA; Jerram MW; Vannorsdall TD; Schretlen DJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Nov; 33(9):1040-8. PubMed ID: 21916658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Using cognitive models to map relations between neuropsychological disorders and human decision-making deficits.
    Yechiam E; Busemeyer JR; Stout JC; Bechara A
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Dec; 16(12):973-8. PubMed ID: 16313662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Neuroeconomics of psychopathy: risk taking in probability discounting of gain and loss predicts psychopathy.
    Takahashi T; Takagishi H; Nishinaka H; Makino T; Fukui H
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2014; 35(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 25433845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Generalized anxiety disorder: clinical presentation, diagnostic features, and guidelines for clinical practice.
    van der Heiden C; Methorst G; Muris P; van der Molen HT
    J Clin Psychol; 2011 Jan; 67(1):58-73. PubMed ID: 20973033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Risky decision making assessed with the gambling task in adults with HIV.
    Hardy DJ; Hinkin CH; Levine AJ; Castellon SA; Lam MN
    Neuropsychology; 2006 May; 20(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 16719628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. An Initial Examination of Performance on Two Versions of the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Buelow MT; Barnhart WR
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Jun; 33(4):502-507. PubMed ID: 29088320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Is human decision making under ambiguity guided by loss frequency regardless of the costs? A developmental study using the Soochow Gambling Task.
    Aïte A; Cassotti M; Rossi S; Poirel N; Lubin A; Houdé O; Moutier S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Oct; 113(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 22727674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. An exploration of relationships among measures of social cognition, decision making, and emotional intelligence.
    Brabec CM; Gfeller JD; Ross MJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2012; 34(8):887-94. PubMed ID: 22734453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Loss Frequency Versus Long-Term Outcome in Preschoolers' Decision Making on a Child Variant of the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Garon N; Longard J
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2015; 4(4):221-9. PubMed ID: 25265197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Self-reported intolerance of uncertainty and behavioural decisions.
    Carleton RN; Duranceau S; Shulman EP; Zerff M; Gonzales J; Mishra S
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Jun; 51():58-65. PubMed ID: 26788617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Threat engagement, disengagement, and sensitivity bias in worry-prone individuals as measured by an emotional go/no-go task.
    Gole M; Köchel A; Schäfer A; Schienle A
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2012 Mar; 43(1):532-9. PubMed ID: 21819812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Sex differences moderate decision making behaviour in high impulsive sensation seekers.
    Dretsch MN; Tipples J
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Jan; 25(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 21432662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.