These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20060198)

  • 1. The effect of removal of point-of-care fecal occult blood testing on performance of digital rectal examinations in the emergency department.
    Cleveland NJ; Yaron M; Ginde AA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Aug; 56(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 20060198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The law of unintended consequences: The Joint Commission regulations and the digital rectal examination.
    Adams BD; McHugh KJ; Bryson SA; Dabulewicz J
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Feb; 51(2):197-201, 201.e1. PubMed ID: 17961818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Point-of-care testing reduces length of stay in emergency department chest pain patients.
    Singer AJ; Ardise J; Gulla J; Cangro J
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Jun; 45(6):587-91. PubMed ID: 15940089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital rectal fecal occult blood screening during gynecologic examination.
    Willis FL; Fanning J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1422-3. PubMed ID: 15167856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital fecal occult blood testing in the ambulatory urology clinic.
    Goetzl MA; Outman JE; Griebling TL; Holzbeierlein JM; Weigel JW; Thrasher JB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jan; 206(1):144-7. PubMed ID: 18155580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Poor test characteristics for the digital rectal examination in trauma patients.
    Shlamovitz GZ; Mower WR; Bergman J; Crisp J; DeVore HK; Hardy D; Sargent M; Shroff SD; Snyder E; Morgan MT
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Jul; 50(1):25-33, 33.e1. PubMed ID: 17391807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical utilization of digital rectal examination and fecal occult blood testing upon hospital admission.
    Scales CD; Fein S; Muir AJ; Rockey DC
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006; 40(10):913-8. PubMed ID: 17063111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective evaluation of the use and outcome of admission stool guaiac testing: the Digital Rectal Examination on Admission to the Medical Service (DREAMS) Study.
    Bini EJ; Reinhold JP; Weinshel EH; Generoso R; Salman L; Dahr G; Pena-Sing I
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 40(9):821-7. PubMed ID: 17016139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An audit of the utility of in-patient fecal occult blood testing.
    Sharma VK; Komanduri S; Nayyar S; Headly A; Modlinger P; Metz DC; Verghese VJ; Wanahita A; Go MF; Howden CW
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Apr; 96(4):1256-60. PubMed ID: 11316179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of the digital rectal examination in the emergency department: a review.
    Kessler C; Bauer SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 43(6):1196-204. PubMed ID: 22883714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lower specificity of occult-blood test on stool collected by digital rectal examination.
    Zhang B; Nakama H; Fattah AS; Kamijo N
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(43):165-7. PubMed ID: 11949640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic yield of a positive fecal occult blood test found on digital rectal examination. Does the finger count?
    Eisner MS; Lewis JH
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Nov; 151(11):2180-4. PubMed ID: 1953220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rectal bleeding in infancy: clinical, allergological, and microbiological examination.
    Arvola T; Ruuska T; Keränen J; Hyöty H; Salminen S; Isolauri E
    Pediatrics; 2006 Apr; 117(4):e760-8. PubMed ID: 16585287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey of internal medicine residents' use of the fecal occult blood test and their understanding of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.
    Sharma VK; Corder FA; Raufman JP; Sharma P; Fennerty MB; Howden CW
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Aug; 95(8):2068-73. PubMed ID: 10950059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Educational Module Improves Emergency Department Evaluation for Suspected Constipation.
    Kurowski J; Kaur S; Katsogridakis Y; Wershil BK; Bass LM
    J Pediatr; 2015 Sep; 167(3):706-10.e1. PubMed ID: 26163084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ondansetron use in the pediatric emergency department and effects on hospitalization and return rates: are we masking alternative diagnoses?
    Sturm JJ; Hirsh DA; Schweickert A; Massey R; Simon HK
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 May; 55(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 20031265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics that distinguish adolescents who present to a children's hospital emergency department from those presenting to a general emergency department.
    Marsh RH; Mollen CJ; Shofer FS; Baren JM
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2009 Jun; 25(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 19458563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fecal occult blood test performance indicators in warfarin-treated patients.
    Kershenbaum A; Lavi I; Rennert G; Almog R
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Feb; 53(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 20087099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enabling the diagnosis of occult psychiatric illness in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial of the computerized, self-administered PRIME-MD diagnostic system.
    Schriger DL; Gibbons PS; Langone CA; Lee S; Altshuler LL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Feb; 37(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 11174229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of the digital rectal examination in the evaluation of undifferentiated abdominal pain.
    Quaas J; Lanigan M; Newman D; McOsker J; Babayev R; Mason C
    Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 27(9):1125-9. PubMed ID: 19931762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.