These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20060677)
1. Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions. Hershberger PE; Pierce PF Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Oct; 81(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 20060677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decision-making on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Derks-Smeets IA; Gietel-Habets JJ; Tibben A; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Geraedts JP; van Golde R; Gomez-Garcia E; van den Bogaart E; van Hooijdonk M; de Die-Smulders CE; van Osch LA Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):1103-12. PubMed ID: 24603131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Moral attitudes and beliefs among couples pursuing PGD for sex selection. Sharp RR; McGowan ML; Verma JA; Landy DC; McAdoo S; Carson SA; Simpson JL; McCullough LB Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Dec; 21(7):838-47. PubMed ID: 21051290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recurrent miscarriage in translocation carriers: no differences in clinical characteristics between couples who accept and couples who decline PGD. De Krom G; Arens YH; Coonen E; Van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM; Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Evers JL; Van Golde RJ; De Die-Smulders CE Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):484-9. PubMed ID: 25432924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More than 10 years after the first 'savior siblings': parental experiences surrounding preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Zierhut H; MacMillan ML; Wagner JE; Bartels DM J Genet Couns; 2013 Oct; 22(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 23624741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: initial findings from a grounded theory study. Hershberger PE; Gallo AM; Kavanaugh K; Olshansky E; Schwartz A; Tur-Kaspa I Soc Sci Med; 2012 May; 74(10):1536-43. PubMed ID: 22445765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dealing with treatment and transfer requests: how PGD-professionals discuss ethical challenges arising in everyday practice. Soto-Lafontaine M; Dondorp W; Provoost V; de Wert G Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Sep; 21(3):375-386. PubMed ID: 29081015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The uptake and outcome of prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington's disease in the Netherlands (1998-2008). van Rij MC; de Koning Gans PA; van Belzen MJ; Roos RA; Geraedts JP; De Rademaeker M; Bijlsma EK; de Die-Smulders CE Clin Genet; 2014 Jan; 85(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 23350580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Support needs of couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer during reproductive decision making. Gietel-Habets JJG; de Die-Smulders CEM; Derks-Smeets IAP; Tibben A; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; van Golde R; Gomez-Garcia E; van Osch LADM Psychooncology; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1795-1801. PubMed ID: 29644780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nordic couples' decision-making processes during assisted reproduction treatments. Sol Olafsdottir H; Wikland M; Möller A Sex Reprod Healthc; 2013 Jun; 4(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 23663922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evidence base regarding the experiences of and attitudes to preimplantation genetic diagnosis in prospective parents. Cunningham J; Goldsmith L; Skirton H Midwifery; 2015 Feb; 31(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 25451549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and reproductive autonomy. Krahn T; Wong SI Reprod Biomed Online; 2009; 19 Suppl 2():34-42. PubMed ID: 19891846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Depression, pregnancy-related anxiety and parental-antenatal attachment in couples using preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Winter C; Van Acker F; Bonduelle M; Van Berkel K; Belva F; Liebaers I; Nekkebroeck J Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1288-99. PubMed ID: 27106283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subsidizing PGD: The Moral Case for Funding Genetic Selection. Kemper JM; Gyngell C; Savulescu J J Bioeth Inq; 2019 Sep; 16(3):405-414. PubMed ID: 31418161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How do couples and spouses/partners consider fertility preservation decisions during cancer treatment planning? A qualitative analysis of dyadic decision making. Mathur A; Hoffman AS; Weston J; Crocker LC; Holman DA; Bradford A; Woodard TL J Psychosoc Oncol; 2021; 39(2):268-284. PubMed ID: 33306007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Long-Term Interpersonal Outcomes for Parents Who Undergo Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Fanconi Anemia: a Qualitative Investigation. Haude K; McCarthy Veach P; LeRoy B; Zierhut H J Genet Couns; 2017 Jun; 26(3):640-655. PubMed ID: 27858211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Profiles and motives for PGD: a prospective cohort study of couples referred for PGD in the Netherlands. van Rij MC; Gielen M; Lulofs R; Evers JL; van Osch L; Muntjewerff N; Geraedts JP; de Die-Smulders CE Hum Reprod; 2011 Jul; 26(7):1826-35. PubMed ID: 21558075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]