69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2006256)
1. [A method of estimating doses in digital luminescent radiography].
Bick U; Fiebich M; Lenzen H; Wiesmann W; Peters PE
Radiologe; 1991 Jan; 31(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 2006256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Abdominal x-ray diagnosis using digital luminescent radiography--a comparison with conventional film-screen systems].
Krug B; Steinbrich W; Dietlein M; Lorenz R; Altenburg A; Küpper T
Rontgenblatter; 1990 May; 43(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 2345848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
Huda W
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) combined with computed radiography. Preliminary evaluation.
de Rooy TP; Oestmann JW; Schultze Kool LJ; Vrooman H; Buchmann F
Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 8369179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
Busch HP; Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Luminescent digital radiography].
Gurvich AM; Miagkova MG; Riudiger Iu
Med Tekh; 1990; (3):27-31. PubMed ID: 2388546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
Seibert JA
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital radiography in urography].
Salvini E; Abbona M; Barigozzi P; Favini G; Pedroli G; Crespi A; Pastori R; Cerutti R; Stacul F
Radiol Med; 1989; 77(1-2):44-50. PubMed ID: 2928564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
Fauber TL
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Digital luminescence radiography of premature and term infants. Possibilities and limitations].
Bartsch M; Richter E
Radiologe; 1992 Jul; 32(7):340-6. PubMed ID: 1509032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of input grey values and contrast profiles: a contribution to the discussion on optimization of evaluation parameters in storage phosphorus radiography].
Schätzl M; Fink U
Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 7881084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
