These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2006259)

  • 21. Impact of low-cost mammography screening on nearby mammography practices.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 3380983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analyzing costs and benefits of mammography screening in the workplace.
    Eley JW
    AAOHN J; 1989 May; 37(5):171-7. PubMed ID: 2496692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Community education programs to promote mammography participation in rural New York State.
    Flynn BS; Gavin P; Worden JK; Ashikaga T; Gautam S; Carpenter J
    Prev Med; 1997; 26(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 9010904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Receptivity of a worksite breast cancer screening education program.
    Paskett ED; Masten KB; Phillips KC; Case LD
    Health Educ Res; 1999 Oct; 14(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 10510074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast screening results from a healthy working population.
    Hutchison J; Tucker AK
    Clin Oncol; 1984 Jun; 10(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6734004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality-oriented mass mammography screening.
    Burhenne LJ; Burhenne HJ; Kan L
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 7997549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implementation of breast cancer screening.
    Pisano ED; McLelland R
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 1909543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preliminary evaluation of an employer-sponsored mammography screening program.
    Bodner KM; Bond GG; Phillips PL; Bollinger LJ; Lipps TE; Cook RR
    J Occup Med; 1992 Aug; 34(8):793-6. PubMed ID: 1506936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mammographic screening: how to operate successfully at low cost.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
    Radiology; 1986 Jul; 160(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 3715053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. U.S. screening mammography services with mobile units: results from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 7724778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A mobile breast screening project in Scotland: lessons learned for national screening.
    Haiart DC; Henderson J; McKenzie L; Kirkpatrick AE
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 1990; 5(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 10107481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Systematic mammographic screening for breast cancer in asymptomatic women].
    Bourdon C; Mazy G; Vandenbroucke A
    J Belge Radiol; 1992 Feb; 75(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 1568999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mobile mammography screening: the James Graham Brown Cancer Center three year experience. Implications for public and professional education.
    Flynn MB; Amin EA; Martin RC
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Jan; 96(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 9470312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcomes of recommendations for breast biopsies in women receiving mammograms from a county health van.
    Kann PE; Bradley C; Lane DS
    Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 9475937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A randomized clinical trial to assess the benefit of offering on-site mobile mammography in addition to health education for older women.
    Reuben DB; Bassett LW; Hirsch SH; Jackson CA; Bastani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1509-14. PubMed ID: 12438046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Principles and first results of the European program of breast cancer screening in the Bas-Rhin].
    Renaud R; Schaffer P; Gairard B; Dale G; Haehnel P; Kleitz C; Guldenfels C
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1991 Jan; 175(1):129-45; discussion 145-7. PubMed ID: 1863855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
    Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The nurse's role in mammography screening.
    Nielsen BB
    Cancer Nurs; 1989 Oct; 12(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 2804962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Population screening for breast cancer by single-view mammography in a geographic region in Sweden.
    Lundgren B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1979 Jun; 62(6):1373-9. PubMed ID: 286109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.