183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2006277)
1. Orbit, skull base, and pharynx: contrast-enhanced fat suppression MR imaging.
Barakos JA; Dillon WP; Chew WM
Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 2006277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: comparison of fat-suppressed and conventional T1-weighted images.
Mirowitz SA; Shady KL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):385-9. PubMed ID: 1632362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fat-suppression MR imaging in neuroradiology: techniques and clinical application.
Tien RD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):369-79. PubMed ID: 1729800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Gadolinium-DTPA combined with a fat suppression technique in studies with magnetic resonance at 0.5 T in soft-tissue neoplasms].
Battolla L; Zampa V; Mascalchi M; Falaschi F; Bagnolesi P; Tessa C; Paolicchi A; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7997603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extracranial lesions of the head and neck: preliminary experience with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging.
Robinson JD; Crawford SC; Teresi LM; Schiller VL; Lufkin RB; Harnsberger HR; Dietrich RB; Crim JR; Duckwiler GR; Spickler EM
Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 2740499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The MRT of the orbit: the value of T1-weighted frequency-selective fat saturation at 1.0 and 1.5 tesla].
Link TM; Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Schuierer G; Grenzebach U; Peters PE
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 8527754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of fat-suppression technique and gadopentetate dimeglumine in magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraocular tumors and simulating lesions.
De Potter P; Flanders AE; Shields JA; Shields CL; Gonzales CF; Rao VM
Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Mar; 112(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 8129659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morton neuroma: evaluation with MR imaging performed with contrast enhancement and fat suppression.
Terk MR; Kwong PK; Suthar M; Horvath BC; Colletti PM
Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):239-41. PubMed ID: 8372200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck.
Wu X; Raz E; Block TK; Geppert C; Hagiwara M; Bruno MT; Fatterpekar GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 25247956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of optic nerve lesions: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine and fat-suppression technique.
Hendrix LE; Kneeland JB; Haughton VM; Daniels DL; Szumowski J; Williams AL; Mark LP; Czervionke LF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):849-54. PubMed ID: 2119121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR diagnosis of paraganglioma of the head and neck: value of contrast enhancement.
van Gils AP; van den Berg R; Falke TH; Bloem JL; Prins HJ; Dillon EH; van der Mey AG; Pauwels EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 8273654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of the myocardium using nonionic contrast medium: signal-intensity changes in patients with subacute myocardial infarction.
Dulce MC; Duerinckx AJ; Hartiala J; Caputo GR; O'Sullivan M; Cheitlin MD; Higgins CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):963-70. PubMed ID: 8470611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra- and paraorbital lesions: value of fat-suppression MR imaging with paramagnetic contrast enhancement.
Tien RD; Chu PK; Hesselink JR; Szumowski J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 1902021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rhabdomyosarcomas in the head and neck: MR imaging evaluation.
Yousem DM; Lexa FJ; Bilaniuk LT; Zimmerman RI
Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):683-6. PubMed ID: 2243968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined gadolinium-enhanced and fat-saturation MR imaging of renal masses.
Semelka RC; Hricak H; Stevens SK; Finegold R; Tomei E; Carroll PR
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):803-9. PubMed ID: 1994422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Fat-suppressing STIR sequences with and without contrast media in the MRT of ENT tumors].
Brüning R; Heuck A; Naegele M; Seelos K; Vahlensieck M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1994 May; 160(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 8173051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Parametrial infiltration of cervix carcinoma: diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted SE sequences at 1.5 tesla].
Scheidler J; Heuck A; Wencke K; Kimmig R; Müller-Lisse U; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Apr; 166(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 9198495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
