These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: comparison of fat-suppressed and conventional T1-weighted images. Mirowitz SA; Shady KL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):385-9. PubMed ID: 1632362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fat-suppression MR imaging in neuroradiology: techniques and clinical application. Tien RD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):369-79. PubMed ID: 1729800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Gadolinium-DTPA combined with a fat suppression technique in studies with magnetic resonance at 0.5 T in soft-tissue neoplasms]. Battolla L; Zampa V; Mascalchi M; Falaschi F; Bagnolesi P; Tessa C; Paolicchi A; Bartolozzi C Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7997603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extracranial lesions of the head and neck: preliminary experience with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Robinson JD; Crawford SC; Teresi LM; Schiller VL; Lufkin RB; Harnsberger HR; Dietrich RB; Crim JR; Duckwiler GR; Spickler EM Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 2740499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The MRT of the orbit: the value of T1-weighted frequency-selective fat saturation at 1.0 and 1.5 tesla]. Link TM; Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Schuierer G; Grenzebach U; Peters PE Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 8527754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of fat-suppression technique and gadopentetate dimeglumine in magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraocular tumors and simulating lesions. De Potter P; Flanders AE; Shields JA; Shields CL; Gonzales CF; Rao VM Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Mar; 112(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 8129659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences. Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Morton neuroma: evaluation with MR imaging performed with contrast enhancement and fat suppression. Terk MR; Kwong PK; Suthar M; Horvath BC; Colletti PM Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):239-41. PubMed ID: 8372200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence versus conventional fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted studies of the head and neck. Wu X; Raz E; Block TK; Geppert C; Hagiwara M; Bruno MT; Fatterpekar GM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 25247956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of optic nerve lesions: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine and fat-suppression technique. Hendrix LE; Kneeland JB; Haughton VM; Daniels DL; Szumowski J; Williams AL; Mark LP; Czervionke LF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):849-54. PubMed ID: 2119121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging. Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR diagnosis of paraganglioma of the head and neck: value of contrast enhancement. van Gils AP; van den Berg R; Falke TH; Bloem JL; Prins HJ; Dillon EH; van der Mey AG; Pauwels EK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 8273654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of the myocardium using nonionic contrast medium: signal-intensity changes in patients with subacute myocardial infarction. Dulce MC; Duerinckx AJ; Hartiala J; Caputo GR; O'Sullivan M; Cheitlin MD; Higgins CB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):963-70. PubMed ID: 8470611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra- and paraorbital lesions: value of fat-suppression MR imaging with paramagnetic contrast enhancement. Tien RD; Chu PK; Hesselink JR; Szumowski J AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 1902021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rhabdomyosarcomas in the head and neck: MR imaging evaluation. Yousem DM; Lexa FJ; Bilaniuk LT; Zimmerman RI Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):683-6. PubMed ID: 2243968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Fat-suppressing STIR sequences with and without contrast media in the MRT of ENT tumors]. Brüning R; Heuck A; Naegele M; Seelos K; Vahlensieck M; Reiser M Rofo; 1994 May; 160(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 8173051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Parametrial infiltration of cervix carcinoma: diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted SE sequences at 1.5 tesla]. Scheidler J; Heuck A; Wencke K; Kimmig R; Müller-Lisse U; Reiser M Rofo; 1997 Apr; 166(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 9198495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]