116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20063834)
1. [Use of transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of early-stage cervical cancer].
Fischerová D; Cibula D; Stenhová H; Vondrichová H; Zikán M; Freitag P; Sláma J; Pavlsta D; Pinkavová I; Dundr P
Ceska Gynekol; 2009 Oct; 74(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 20063834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer.
Fischerova D; Cibula D; Stenhova H; Vondrichova H; Calda P; Zikan M; Freitag P; Slama J; Dundr P; Belacek J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 17892456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of tumor size following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Pinkavova I; Fischerova D; Zikan M; Burgetova A; Slama J; Svarovsky J; Dundr P; Dusek L; Cibula D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 42(6):705-12. PubMed ID: 23495185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical carcinoma and comparison with spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Yang WT; Walkden SB; Ho S; Cheung TH; Lam SK; Teo J; Metreweli C
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):610-6. PubMed ID: 8696696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The negative predictive value of clinical examination with or without anesthesia versus magnetic resonance imaging for parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer stages IB1 to IIA.
Bleker SM; Bipat S; Spijkerboer AM; van der Velden J; Stoker J; Kenter GG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):193-8. PubMed ID: 23221736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early-stage cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound - a European multicenter trial.
Epstein E; Testa A; Gaurilcikas A; Di Legge A; Ameye L; Atstupenaite V; Valentini AL; Gui B; Wallengren NO; Pudaric S; Cizauskas A; Måsbäck A; Zannoni GF; Kannisto P; Zikan M; Pinkavova I; Burgetova A; Dundr P; Nemejcova K; Cibula D; Fischerova D
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Mar; 128(3):449-53. PubMed ID: 23022593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multimodal endocavitary ultrasound versus MRI and clinical findings in pre- and post-treatment advanced cervical cancer. Preliminary report.
Csutak C; Badea R; Bolboaca SD; Ordeanu C; Nagy VM; Fekete Z; Chiorean L; Dudea SM
Med Ultrason; 2016 Mar; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 26962558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staging of cervical cancer: reliability of transrectal US.
Innocenti P; Pulli F; Savino L; Nicolucci A; Pandimiglio A; Menchi I; Massi G
Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):201-5. PubMed ID: 1523308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Parametrial Status in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Perniola G; Fischetti M; Tomao F; Di Donato V; Palaia I; Santangelo G; Lecce F; Piccioni MG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
Oncology; 2020; 98(9):603-611. PubMed ID: 32492692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Experience with the combined diagnosis and therapy of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix (stage FIGO IIB-III). Transrectal ultrasonography and CT in the staging and in follow-up after therapy. Preliminary results].
Marano P; Summaria V; Smaniotto D; Danza FM; Speca S; Valentini AL; Greggi S; Lancia M; Cellini N
Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 8272550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of presence, size and extent of invasive cervical cancer.
Testa AC; Ludovisi M; Manfredi R; Zannoni G; Gui B; Basso D; Di Legge A; Licameli A; Di Bidino R; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 19705403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement of two-dimensional and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer.
Chiappa V; Di Legge A; Valentini AL; Gui B; Miccò M; Ludovisi M; Giansiracusa C; Testa AC; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 25091827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of image fusion in the staging of prostatic carcinoma.
Selli C; Caramella D; Giusti S; Conti A; Tognetti A; Mogorovich A; De Maria M; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17310289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
