These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comments on time in action and perception. Granit R Hum Neurobiol; 1985; 4(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 4030424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS Nat Rev Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 5(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 15152199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Visually guided pointing to remembered locations and subjective representation of space. Tiacci I; Battaglini PP; Galletti C; Fattori P Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1994; 70(1-2):43-9. PubMed ID: 7840951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction. Corral MJ; Escera C Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 10 years of illusions. Smeets JB; Brenner E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1501-4. PubMed ID: 17154790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Characteristics of visual perception in seven-year-old children differing in functional maturity of the brain structures]. Morozova LV; Zviagina NV; Terebova NN Fiziol Cheloveka; 2008; 34(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 18365629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention. Müller MM Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration? Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between awareness and attention: evidence from ERP responses. Koivisto M; Kainulainen P; Revonsuo A Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2891-9. PubMed ID: 19545577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-lived brain state after cued motor imagery in naive subjects. Pfurtscheller G; Scherer R; Müller-Putz GR; Lopes da Silva FH Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 28(7):1419-26. PubMed ID: 18973568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Hommel B Trends Cogn Sci; 2004 Nov; 8(11):494-500. PubMed ID: 15491903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception, action, and experience: unraveling the golden braid. Clark A Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1460-8. PubMed ID: 19026670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention. McDonald JJ; Green JJ Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural correlates of cue retrieval, task set reconfiguration, and rule mapping in the explicit cue task switching paradigm. Travers S; West R Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):588-601. PubMed ID: 18282198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex differences in cue perception in a visual scene: investigation of cue type. Barkley CL; Gabriel KI Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 17469918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: effects of stimulus and task factors. Yovel G; Levy J; Yovel I J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1369-85. PubMed ID: 11766931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]