298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20064580)
1. Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task.
Horváth J; Winkler I
Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 20064580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?
Horváth J; Winkler I; Bendixen A
Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18468765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
Munka L; Berti S
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events.
Horváth J; Roeber U; Bendixen A; Schröger E
Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1229():193-203. PubMed ID: 18634759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Processing of novel identifiability and duration in children and adults.
Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
Biol Psychol; 2011 Jan; 86(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20959134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP).
Pakarinen S; Takegata R; Rinne T; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 17070103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary motor area contribution to attentional reorienting after distraction.
Horváth J; Maess B; Berti S; Schröger E
Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 18287943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploiting temporal predictability: Event-related potential correlates of task-supportive temporal cue processing in auditory distraction.
Volosin M; Grimm S; Horváth J
Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():120-31. PubMed ID: 26947619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features.
Hölig C; Berti S
Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
Wise V; McFarlane AC; Clark CR; Battersby M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19607864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ERPs to infrequent auditory stimuli in two- and three-stimulus versions of the inter-modal oddball task.
Brown CR; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 19733601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of task-irrelevant high-speed verbal stimulation on a visual/verbal word-discrimination task: an event-related potential study.
Uemura J; Hoshiyama M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 121(12):2065-9. PubMed ID: 20566301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preattentive phonotactic processing as indexed by the mismatch negativity.
Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2174-85. PubMed ID: 19947859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
