These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20064820)

  • 1. Rating scales for low back pain.
    Longo UG; Loppini M; Denaro L; Maffulli N; Denaro V
    Br Med Bull; 2010; 94():81-144. PubMed ID: 20064820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow.
    Longo UG; Franceschi F; Loppini M; Maffulli N; Denaro V
    Br Med Bull; 2008; 87():131-61. PubMed ID: 18539627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of the new Backache Index (BAI) in patients with low back pain.
    Farasyn A; Meeusen R
    Spine J; 2006; 6(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16934729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study.
    Holm I; Friis A; Storheim K; Brox JI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 12698128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A German version of the Extended Aberdeen Back Pain Scale: development and evaluation.
    Osthus H; Cziske R; Jacobi E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 16508554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pain, disability, and satisfaction outcomes and predictors of outcomes: a practice-based study of chronic low back pain patients attending primary care and chiropractic physicians.
    Nyiendo J; Haas M; Goldberg B; Sexton G
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Sep; 24(7):433-9. PubMed ID: 11562650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain.
    Ostelo RW; de Vet HC
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Aug; 19(4):593-607. PubMed ID: 15949778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of treatment for chronic low back pain].
    Cheng J; Wang H; Zheng W; Li C; Zhou Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 28(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 24693793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical impairment index: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with acute low back pain.
    Fritz JM; Piva SR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1189-94. PubMed ID: 12782991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [French validation of a disability rating scale for the evaluation of low back pain (EIFEL questionnaire)].
    Coste J; Le Parc JM; Berge E; Delecoeuillerie G; Paolaggi JB
    Rev Rhum Ed Fr; 1993 May; 60(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 8167640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability scores and the severity of low back pain.
    Co YY; Eaton S; Maxwell MW
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993 Jan; 16(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8423417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Criteria validation of the Roland Morris questionnaire. A Danish translation of the international scale for the assessment of functional level in patients with low back pain and sciatica].
    Albert HB; Jensen AM; Dahl D; Rasmussen MN
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Apr; 165(18):1875-80. PubMed ID: 12772398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for yellow flags in first-time acute low back pain: reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire.
    Grotle M; Vøllestad NK; Brox JI
    Clin J Pain; 2006 Jun; 22(5):458-67. PubMed ID: 16772801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship of the Functional Rating Index with disability, pain, and quality of life in patients with low back pain.
    Ceran F; Ozcan A
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Oct; 12(10):CR435-9. PubMed ID: 17006404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain.
    Jordan K; Dunn KM; Lewis M; Croft P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16360560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.
    Christakou A; Andriopoulou M; Asimakopoulos P
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2011; 24(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 21849728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the core outcome measure in whiplash.
    Rebbeck TJ; Refshauge KM; Maher CG; Stewart M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):696-702. PubMed ID: 17413477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An assessment of a short composite questionnaire designed for use in an interventional spine pain management setting.
    Burnham R; Stanford G; Gray L
    PM R; 2012 Jun; 4(6):413-8; quiz 418. PubMed ID: 22732153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
    van der Roer N; Ostelo RW; Bekkering GE; van Tulder MW; de Vet HC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(5):578-82. PubMed ID: 16508555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.