These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20065182)

  • 1. Is seeing believing?
    Brundage MD
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Feb; 28(5):711-3. PubMed ID: 20065182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicating the results of randomized clinical trials: do patients understand multidimensional patient-reported outcomes?
    McNair AG; Brookes ST; Davis CR; Argyropoulos M; Blazeby JM
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Feb; 28(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 20065187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mortality versus survival graphs: improving temporal consistency in perceptions of treatment effectiveness.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Apr; 66(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 17137743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Progress in cancer care: the hope, the hype, and the gap between reality and perception.
    Saltz LB
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Nov; 26(31):5020-1. PubMed ID: 18794538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An exploration of participants' treatment preferences in a partial RCT.
    Miranda J
    Can J Nurs Res; 2004 Sep; 36(3):100-14. PubMed ID: 15551665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: so why are they lengthening?
    Beardsley E; Jefford M; Mileshkin L
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Mar; 25(9):e13-4. PubMed ID: 17369564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "You may have already won..": an examination of the use of lottery payments in research.
    Brown JS; Schonfeld TL; Gordon BG
    IRB; 2006; 28(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16680874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the attitudes of the elderly towards enrolment into cancer clinical trials.
    Townsley CA; Chan KK; Pond GR; Marquez C; Siu LL; Straus SE
    BMC Cancer; 2006 Feb; 6():34. PubMed ID: 16466574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rx for caries prevention: time line for home care. A software aid for communication of patient instructions for management of dental caries.
    Newitter DA; Meiers JC; Kazemi RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):204-7. PubMed ID: 11931140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health literacy: more choice, but do cancer patients have the skills to decide?
    Manning DL; Dickens C
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2006 Dec; 15(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 17177901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent: practices and views of investigators in a multinational clinical trial.
    Sabik L; Pace CA; Forster-Gertner HP; Wendler D; Bebchuk JD; Tavel JA; McNay LA; Killen J; Emanuel EJ; Grady C
    IRB; 2005; 27(5):13-8. PubMed ID: 16425476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Literacy and diabetes self-management.
    Nath C
    Am J Nurs; 2007 Jun; 107(6 Suppl):43-9; quiz 49. PubMed ID: 17563437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study design attributes influenced patients' willingness to participate in clinical research: a randomized vignette-based study.
    Agoritsas T; Deom M; Perneger TV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 20558036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meeting the obligation to communicate clinical trial results to study volunteers.
    Getz K; Hallinan Z; Simmons D; Brickman MJ; Jumadilova Z; Pauer L; Wilenzick M; Morrison B
    Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol; 2012 Mar; 5(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 22390557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appropriate Use of Psychology in Patient-Physician Communication: Influencing Wisely.
    Fridman I; Epstein AS; Higgins ET
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):725-6. PubMed ID: 26181519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors.
    Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Grisso T
    IRB; 2004; 26(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 15069970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical trials: patient issues in the decision-making process.
    Bujorian GA
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1988; 15(6):779-83. PubMed ID: 3205836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients versus surrogates: whose opinion counts on ethics review panels?
    Llewellyn-Thomas HA; Thiel EC; Clark RM
    Clin Res; 1989 Sep; 37(3):501-5. PubMed ID: 2776397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.