These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20065726)

  • 1. The FloTrac system--measurement of stroke volume and the assessment of dynamic fluid loading.
    Hashim B; Lerner AB
    Int Anesthesiol Clin; 2010; 48(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 20065726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is a fluid challenge?
    Cecconi M; Parsons AK; Rhodes A
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2011 Jun; 17(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 21508838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Circulation monitoring of critically ill patients with the Pulse Contour Cardiac Output system].
    Afshari A; Perner A; Bonde J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(18):1746-9. PubMed ID: 16729924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FloTrac® monitoring system: what are its uses in critically ill medical patients?
    Argueta E; Berdine G; Pena C; Nugent KM
    Am J Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 349(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 25584624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stroke volume variation during hemorrhage and after fluid loading: impact of different tidal volumes.
    Renner J; Cavus E; Meybohm P; Tonner P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Lutter G; Bein B
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 May; 51(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 17430313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Four-terminal impedance monitoring of cardiac output: an elegant clinical application of a classical engineering trick.
    Kroll MW
    Europace; 2010 May; 12(5):616-7. PubMed ID: 20421223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. LiDCO systems.
    Sundar S; Panzica P
    Int Anesthesiol Clin; 2010; 48(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 20065728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
    Mutoh T; Ishikawa T; Nishino K; Yasui N
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jul; 21(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19542999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardiography.
    Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Roullet S; Quinart A; Revel P; Sztark F
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Aug; 109(2):466-9. PubMed ID: 19608819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
    Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
    Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Myocardial performance index during rapidly changing loading conditions: impact of different tidal ventilation.
    Renner J; Cavus E; Gruenewald M; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Lutter G; Steffen M; Bein B
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 18028576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program.
    McGee WT
    J Intensive Care Med; 2009; 24(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 19736180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness.
    Charron C; Caille V; Jardin F; Vieillard-Baron A
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2006 Jun; 12(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 16672785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invasive measures of left ventricular preload.
    Monnet X; Teboul JL
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2006 Jun; 12(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 16672783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A dynamic view of dynamic indices.
    Fischer MO; Guinot PG; Biais M; Mahjoub Y; Mallat J; Lorne E;
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2016 Oct; 82(10):1115-1121. PubMed ID: 27407021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.
    Cannesson M; Musard H; Desebbe O; Boucau C; Simon R; Hénaine R; Lehot JJ
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 19151280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional hemodynamic monitoring.
    Pinsky MR
    Intensive Care Med; 2002 Apr; 28(4):386-8. PubMed ID: 11967589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by the LiDCOplus and FloTrac-Vigileo system.
    de Wilde RB; Geerts BF; van den Berg PC; Jansen JR
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Sep; 64(9):1004-9. PubMed ID: 19686486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
    Perner A; Faber T
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.