197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20065863)
1. Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus extrapedicular vertebroplasty using polymethylmethacrylate.
Erkan S; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Cho W; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 May; 23(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20065863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Molloy S; Mathis JM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1549-54. PubMed ID: 12865843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical effects of unipedicular vertebroplasty on intact vertebrae.
Higgins KB; Harten RD; Langrana NA; Reiter MF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1540-7; discussion 1548. PubMed ID: 12865841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of the vertebral jack tool and the inflatable bone tamp for reduction of osteoporotic spine fractures.
Sietsma MS; Hosman AJ; Verdonschot NJ; Aalsma AM; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E640-4. PubMed ID: 19680089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies.
Luo J; Daines L; Charalambous A; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2865-73. PubMed ID: 20010394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is kyphoplasty better than vertebroplasty in restoring normal mechanical function to an injured spine?
Luo J; Bertram W; Sangar D; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1050-7. PubMed ID: 20004264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical analysis of intravertebral pressures during vertebroplasty of cadaveric spines with and without simulated metastases.
Reidy D; Ahn H; Mousavi P; Finkelstein J; Whyne CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1534-9. PubMed ID: 12865840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of augmentation techniques for insufficiency fractures.
McCann H; LePine M; Glaser J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):E499-502. PubMed ID: 16816750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of bone density on vertebral strength and stiffness after percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Graham J; Ahn C; Hai N; Buch BD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):E505-11. PubMed ID: 17700430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques.
White KK; Oka R; Mahar AT; Lowry A; Garfin SR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):E355-8. PubMed ID: 16721279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertebroplasty in the treatment of back pain.
Muto M; Muto E; Izzo R; Diano AA; Lavanga A; Di Furia U
Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 15775889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty.
Lim TH; Brebach GT; Renner SM; Kim WJ; Kim JG; Lee RE; Andersson GB; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jun; 27(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 12065977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preliminary biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement adjacent to vertebroplasty under cyclic loading.
Oakland RJ; Furtado NR; Wilcox RK; Timothy J; Hall RM
Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 18640876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biomechanical study of vertebroplasty with geneX(®) cement augmentation in a calf osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model].
Zhang S; Jiang J; Zhu Q; Huang Z
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(6):843-6. PubMed ID: 22699067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty.
Steinmann J; Tingey CT; Cruz G; Dai Q
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15644756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration.
Luo J; Skrzypiec DM; Pollintine P; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):1110-9. PubMed ID: 17229596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experimental study of percutaneous vertebroplasty with a novel bone void filling container system].
Wang TP; Zhang KB; Zheng ZM; Liu H; Yu BS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 91(15):1041-6. PubMed ID: 21609639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
