These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20066034)

  • 1. Conformational transitions upon ligand binding: holo-structure prediction from apo conformations.
    Seeliger D; de Groot BL
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Jan; 6(1):e1000634. PubMed ID: 20066034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes.
    McGovern SL; Shoichet BK
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):2895-907. PubMed ID: 12825931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inherent versus induced protein flexibility: Comparisons within and between apo and holo structures.
    Clark JJ; Benson ML; Smith RD; Carlson HA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jan; 15(1):e1006705. PubMed ID: 30699115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apo adenylate kinase encodes its holo form: a principal component and varimax analysis.
    Cukier RI
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Feb; 113(6):1662-72. PubMed ID: 19159290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ligand-Binding-Site Refinement to Generate Reliable Holo Protein Structure Conformations from Apo Structures.
    Guterres H; Park SJ; Jiang W; Im W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jan; 61(1):535-546. PubMed ID: 33337877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AHoJ-DB: A PDB-wide Assignment of apo & holo Relationships Based on Individual Protein-Ligand Interactions.
    Feidakis CP; Krivak R; Hoksza D; Novotny M
    J Mol Biol; 2024 Sep; 436(17):168545. PubMed ID: 38508305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding.
    Gunasekaran K; Nussinov R
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):257-73. PubMed ID: 17059826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Holo Protein Conformation Generation from Apo Structures by Ligand Binding Site Refinement.
    Zhang J; Li H; Zhao X; Wu Q; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5806-5820. PubMed ID: 36342197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conformational switches modulate protein interactions in peptide antibiotic synthetases.
    Koglin A; Mofid MR; Löhr F; Schäfer B; Rogov VV; Blum MM; Mittag T; Marahiel MA; Bernhard F; Dötsch V
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5771):273-6. PubMed ID: 16614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The complex interplay between ligand binding and conformational structure of the folate binding protein (folate receptor): Biological perspectives.
    Holm J; Bruun SW; Hansen SI
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Oct; 1854(10 Pt A):1249-59. PubMed ID: 26116148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling holo-ACP:DH and holo-ACP:KR complexes of modular polyketide synthases: a docking and molecular dynamics study.
    Anand S; Mohanty D
    BMC Struct Biol; 2012 May; 12():10. PubMed ID: 22639887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A previously unobserved conformation for the human Pex5p receptor suggests roles for intrinsic flexibility and rigid domain motions in ligand binding.
    Stanley WA; Pursiainen NV; Garman EF; Juffer AH; Wilmanns M; Kursula P
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Apr; 7():24. PubMed ID: 17428317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conformational selection in silico: loop latching motions and ligand binding in enzymes.
    Wong S; Jacobson MP
    Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 17932934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of ligand binding on the association properties and conformation in solution of retinoic acid receptors RXR and RAR.
    Egea PF; Rochel N; Birck C; Vachette P; Timmins PA; Moras D
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(2):557-76. PubMed ID: 11254382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conformational heterogeneity in apo and drug-bound structures of Toxoplasma gondii prolyl-tRNA synthetase.
    Mishra S; Malhotra N; Kumari S; Sato M; Kikuchi H; Yogavel M; Sharma A
    Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun; 2019 Nov; 75(Pt 11):714-724. PubMed ID: 31702585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Holo-like and Druggable Protein Conformations from Enhanced Sampling of Binding Pocket Volume and Shape.
    Basciu A; Malloci G; Pietrucci F; Bonvin AMJJ; Vargiu AV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Apr; 59(4):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 30883122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are induced fit protein conformational changes caused by ligand-binding predictable? A molecular dynamics investigation.
    Gao C; Desaphy J; Vieth M
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 28419481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.
    Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the applicability of elastic network normal modes in small-molecule docking.
    Dietzen M; Zotenko E; Hildebrandt A; Lengauer T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):844-56. PubMed ID: 22320151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.