286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20066034)
1. Conformational transitions upon ligand binding: holo-structure prediction from apo conformations.
Seeliger D; de Groot BL
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Jan; 6(1):e1000634. PubMed ID: 20066034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes.
McGovern SL; Shoichet BK
J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):2895-907. PubMed ID: 12825931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inherent versus induced protein flexibility: Comparisons within and between apo and holo structures.
Clark JJ; Benson ML; Smith RD; Carlson HA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jan; 15(1):e1006705. PubMed ID: 30699115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apo adenylate kinase encodes its holo form: a principal component and varimax analysis.
Cukier RI
J Phys Chem B; 2009 Feb; 113(6):1662-72. PubMed ID: 19159290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ligand-Binding-Site Refinement to Generate Reliable Holo Protein Structure Conformations from Apo Structures.
Guterres H; Park SJ; Jiang W; Im W
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jan; 61(1):535-546. PubMed ID: 33337877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
Ding F; Dokholyan NV
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding.
Gunasekaran K; Nussinov R
J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):257-73. PubMed ID: 17059826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Holo Protein Conformation Generation from Apo Structures by Ligand Binding Site Refinement.
Zhang J; Li H; Zhao X; Wu Q; Huang SY
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5806-5820. PubMed ID: 36342197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conformational switches modulate protein interactions in peptide antibiotic synthetases.
Koglin A; Mofid MR; Löhr F; Schäfer B; Rogov VV; Blum MM; Mittag T; Marahiel MA; Bernhard F; Dötsch V
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5771):273-6. PubMed ID: 16614225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling holo-ACP:DH and holo-ACP:KR complexes of modular polyketide synthases: a docking and molecular dynamics study.
Anand S; Mohanty D
BMC Struct Biol; 2012 May; 12():10. PubMed ID: 22639887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The complex interplay between ligand binding and conformational structure of the folate binding protein (folate receptor): Biological perspectives.
Holm J; Bruun SW; Hansen SI
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Oct; 1854(10 Pt A):1249-59. PubMed ID: 26116148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A previously unobserved conformation for the human Pex5p receptor suggests roles for intrinsic flexibility and rigid domain motions in ligand binding.
Stanley WA; Pursiainen NV; Garman EF; Juffer AH; Wilmanns M; Kursula P
BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Apr; 7():24. PubMed ID: 17428317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conformational selection in silico: loop latching motions and ligand binding in enzymes.
Wong S; Jacobson MP
Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 17932934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Holo-like and Druggable Protein Conformations from Enhanced Sampling of Binding Pocket Volume and Shape.
Basciu A; Malloci G; Pietrucci F; Bonvin AMJJ; Vargiu AV
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Apr; 59(4):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 30883122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conformational heterogeneity in apo and drug-bound structures of Toxoplasma gondii prolyl-tRNA synthetase.
Mishra S; Malhotra N; Kumari S; Sato M; Kikuchi H; Yogavel M; Sharma A
Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun; 2019 Nov; 75(Pt 11):714-724. PubMed ID: 31702585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of ligand binding on the association properties and conformation in solution of retinoic acid receptors RXR and RAR.
Egea PF; Rochel N; Birck C; Vachette P; Timmins PA; Moras D
J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(2):557-76. PubMed ID: 11254382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are induced fit protein conformational changes caused by ligand-binding predictable? A molecular dynamics investigation.
Gao C; Desaphy J; Vieth M
J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 28419481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.
Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the applicability of elastic network normal modes in small-molecule docking.
Dietzen M; Zotenko E; Hildebrandt A; Lengauer T
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):844-56. PubMed ID: 22320151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer Simulations Predict High Structural Heterogeneity of Functional State of NMDA Receptors.
Sinitskiy AV; Pande VS
Biophys J; 2018 Sep; 115(5):841-852. PubMed ID: 30029773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
