These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47. Array CGH in human leukemia: from somatics to genetics. van der Veken LT; Buijs A Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 135(3-4):260-70. PubMed ID: 21893961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fish analysis at diagnosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Avet-Loiseau H Leuk Lymphoma; 1999 May; 33(5-6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10342572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparative genomic hybridization in the investigation of myeloid leukemias. Bentz M; Döhner H; Huck K; Schütz B; Ganser A; Joos S; du Manoir S; Lichter P Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1995 Mar; 12(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 7536458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fast approach for clarification of chromosomal aberrations by using LM-PCR and FT-CGH in leukaemic sample. Dittmann K; Przybylski GK; Grabarczyk P; Dölken G; Gesk S; Siebert R; Schmidt CA Acta Haematol; 2012; 127(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 21986343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Genomic imbalances detected through array CGH in fetuses with holoprosencephaly. Machado IN; Heinrich JK; Barini R Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2011 Feb; 69(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 21359414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Distinctive genotypes in infants with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Mansur MB; van Delft FW; Colman SM; Furness CL; Gibson J; Emerenciano M; Kempski H; Clappier E; Cave H; Soulier J; Pombo-de-Oliveira MS; Greaves M; Ford AM Br J Haematol; 2015 Nov; 171(4):574-84. PubMed ID: 26205622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization detects copy number variations with prognostic relevance in 80% of ALL with normal karyotype or failed chromosome analysis. Mühlbacher V; Haferlach T; Kern W; Zenger M; Schnittger S; Haferlach C Leukemia; 2016 Feb; 30(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 26449660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Molecular cytogenetics in haematological malignancy: current technology and future prospects. Kearney L; Horsley SW Chromosoma; 2005 Sep; 114(4):286-94. PubMed ID: 16003502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Delimiting the use of comparative genomic hybridization in human myeloid neoplastic disorders. Gebhart E; Verdorfer I; Saul W; Trautmann U; Brecevic L Int J Oncol; 2000 Jun; 16(6):1099-105. PubMed ID: 10811980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Three cases of primary cutaneous lymphoblastic lymphoma: microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization and gene expression profiling studies with review of literature. Vezzoli P; Novara F; Fanoni D; Gambini D; Balice Y; Venegoni L; Paulli M; Crosti C; Berti E Leuk Lymphoma; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1978-87. PubMed ID: 21879810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Does the S phase have an impact on the accuracy of comparative genomic hybridization profiles in single fibroblasts and human blastomeres? Ramos L; del Rey J; Daina G; Martinez-Passarell O; Rius M; Tuñón D; Campillo M; Benet J; Navarro J Fertil Steril; 2014 Feb; 101(2):488-95. PubMed ID: 24314925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparative genomic hybridisation for the analysis of chromosomal imbalances in solid tumours and haematological malignancies. Zitzelsberger H; Lehmann L; Werner M; Bauchinger M Histochem Cell Biol; 1997; 108(4-5):403-17. PubMed ID: 9387933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]