277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20068210)
1. The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Woolf SH
JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):162-3. PubMed ID: 20068210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. US Preventive Services Task Force and breast cancer screening.
DeAngelis CD; Fontanarosa PB
JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):172-3. PubMed ID: 20068215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient preferences in breast cancer screening: lessons to be learned from the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Sadigh G; Kelly AM; Fagerlin A; Carlos RC
Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1333-6. PubMed ID: 21835650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Media coverage of U.S. preventive services task force recommendations: a commentary.
Petitti DB; Calonge N
Am J Prev Med; 2011 May; 40(5):579-80. PubMed ID: 21496760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for screening mammography: evidence-based medicine or the death of science?
Thrall JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Jan; 7(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 20129260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-examining current breast cancer screening: An analysis of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for breast cancer screening.
Beard C; Beard V
Women Health; 2016; 56(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 26362522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening mammography and the "r" word.
Truog RD
N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(26):2501-3. PubMed ID: 19940292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: the unbalanced view.
Evans WP; Lee CH; Monsees BS; Monticciolo DL; Rebner M
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):297; author reply 297-8. PubMed ID: 20851949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.
Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines are not supported by the scientific evidence.
Kopans DB
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):294-5; author reply 295. PubMed ID: 20851947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.
Lee CS; Moy L; Friedewald SM; Sickles EA; Monticciolo DL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):241-245. PubMed ID: 29045178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On mammography--more agreement than disagreement.
Partridge AH; Winer EP
N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(26):2499-501. PubMed ID: 19940286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening.
Fletcher SW
N Engl J Med; 1997 Apr; 336(16):1180-3. PubMed ID: 9099666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US panel reaffirms controversial 2009 mammography recommendations.
McCarthy M
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h2174. PubMed ID: 25902838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening.
Squiers LB; Holden DJ; Dolina SE; Kim AE; Bann CM; Renaud JM
Am J Prev Med; 2011 May; 40(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 21496748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Omissions of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Zuurbier RA
Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):305; author reply 305-6. PubMed ID: 21436102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A Public Health Framework for Screening Mammography: Evidence-Based vs Politically Mandated Care.
Lin KW; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2016 Mar; 315(10):977-8. PubMed ID: 26779886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. USPSTF erroneously understated life-years-gained benefit of mammographic screening of women in their 40s.
Helvie MA; Petitti DB; Calonge N; Melnyk BM; Wilt TJ
Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):958-9. PubMed ID: 21339356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lessons from the mammography wars.
Gøtzsche PC
N Engl J Med; 2010 Dec; 363(26):2569; author reply 2570. PubMed ID: 21175334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines ignore important scientific evidence and should be revised or withdrawn.
Kopans DB
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20574081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
