These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20068210)

  • 21. Behavioral consequences of conflict-oriented health news coverage: the 2009 mammography guideline controversy and online information seeking.
    Weeks BE; Friedenberg LM; Southwell BG; Slater JS
    Health Commun; 2012; 27(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 21823950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs.
    Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
    JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):164-5. PubMed ID: 20068211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Breast cancer screening: from science to recommendation.
    Petitti DB; Calonge N; LeFevre ML; Melnyk BM; Wilt TJ; Schwartz JS;
    Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 20574080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lessons from the mammography wars.
    Quanstrum KH; Hayward RA
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Sep; 363(11):1076-9. PubMed ID: 20825322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are not supported by science: the scientific support for mammography screening.
    Kopans DB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):843-57. PubMed ID: 20868889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New USPSTF Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: A Talk With Task Force Vice Chair Dr John Wong.
    Wong JB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jun; 222(6):e2431404. PubMed ID: 38713007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs, and polarization.
    Berlin L; Hall FM
    Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20413746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Potential impact of USPSTF recommendations on early diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Aragon R; Morgan J; Wong JH; Lum S
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3137-42. PubMed ID: 21947591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A doctor talks about screening mammography.
    Robb-Nicholson C
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 Feb; 17(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 20429119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
    Patti J; Lee C
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. PubMed ID: 20851948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
    Ringash J;
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reframing the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on screening for glaucoma.
    Parrish RK
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 158(5):860-2. PubMed ID: 25437830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence for U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations against routine mammography for females between 40-49 years of age.
    Karimi P; Shahrokni A; Moradi S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(3):2137-9. PubMed ID: 23679332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. NCI remains committed to current mammography guidelines.
    Von Eschenbach AC
    Oncologist; 2002; 7(3):170-1. PubMed ID: 12065784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Awareness of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommended changes in mammography screening guidelines, accuracy of awareness, sources of knowledge about recommendations, and attitudes about updated screening guidelines in women ages 40-49 and 50+.
    Kiviniemi MT; Hay JL
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Oct; 12():899. PubMed ID: 23092125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What's a woman to do about the new breast and cervical cancer screening recommendations?
    Lowe NK
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 39(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 20409112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of the controversial US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on the use of screening mammography.
    Sharpe RE; Levin DC; Parker L; Rao VM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23290669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mammography in 40-year-old women: what difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines.
    Shen N; Hammonds LS; Madsen D; Dale P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3066-71. PubMed ID: 21863364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammography screening for breast cancer: a view from 2 worlds.
    Murphy AM
    JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 20068212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wise words from Drs Berlin and Hall.
    Baines CJ
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):298; author reply 298. PubMed ID: 20851950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.