These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20069254)

  • 1. Validity of staining and marginal ditching as criteria for diagnosis of secondary caries around occlusal amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Magalhães CS; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Ferreira EF
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20069254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal ditching and staining as a predictor of secondary caries around amalgam restorations: a clinical and microbiological study.
    Kidd EA; Joyston-Bechal S; Beighton D
    J Dent Res; 1995 May; 74(5):1206-11. PubMed ID: 7540634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosis of secondary caries: a laboratory study.
    Kidd EA; Joyston-Bechal S; Beighton D
    Br Dent J; 1994 Feb; 176(4):135-8, 139. PubMed ID: 8123316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grey discoloration for the diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Rudolphy MP; van Loveren C; van Amerongen JP
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 8860028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grey discolouration and marginal fracture for the diagnosis of secondary caries in molars with occlusal amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Rudolphy MP; van Amerongen JP; Penning C; ten Cate JM
    Caries Res; 1995; 29(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 8521439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of proximal secondary caries at cervical class II-amalgam restoration margins in vitro.
    Neuhaus KW; Rodrigues JA; Seemann R; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 22429927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The amalgam margin angle, marginal breakdown and adjacent caries in occlusal enamel, a pilot study on extracted teeth.
    Grajower R; Novickas D
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 May; 15(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 3164365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of several techniques for the detection of secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations.
    Ando M; González-Cabezas C; Isaacs RL; Eckert GJ; Stookey GK
    Caries Res; 2004; 38(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 15181334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Staining of residual caries under freshly-packed amalgam restorations exposed to tea/chlorhexidine in vitro.
    Kidd EA; Joyston-Bechal S; Smith MM
    Int Dent J; 1990 Aug; 40(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 2397953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Secondary caries around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Navarro MF; Consolaro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Sep; 74(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 7473273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between gap width and recurrent dental caries beneath occlusal margins of amalgam restorations.
    Hodges DJ; Mangum FI; Ward MT
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 23(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 7587139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports.
    Mjör IA; Toffenetti F
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 11203922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Validity of decision criteria for replacement of fillings].
    Hannig C; Kupilas FJ; Wolkewitz M; Attin T
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(4):328-38. PubMed ID: 19485073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seal, replacement or monitoring amalgam restorations with occlusal marginal defects? Results of a 10-year clinical trial.
    Moncada G; Fernández E; Mena K; Martin J; Vildósola P; De Oliveira Junior OB; Estay J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1371-8. PubMed ID: 26231302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Accuracy of Two Different Criteria for the Detection of Caries Lesions around Restorations in Primary Teeth.
    Moro BLP; Pontes LRA; Maia HC; Freitas RD; Tedesco TK; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Ekstrand KR; Imparato JCP; Cenci MS; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2022; 56(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 35504257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.