467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20069549)
1. Value of ultrasonographic detection of normal ovarian tissue in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses in pediatric patients.
Stankovic ZB; Bjelica A; Djukic MK; Savic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 20069549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of detection of normal ovarian tissue (the 'ovarian crescent sign') in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Hillaby K; Aslam N; Salim R; Lawrence A; Raju KS; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 14971002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ovarian Preservation from Tumors and Torsions in Girls: Prospective Diagnostic Study.
Stanković ZB; Sedlecky K; Savić D; Lukač BJ; Mažibrada I; Perovic S
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 30(3):405-412. PubMed ID: 28137453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of the 'ovarian crescent sign' in the evaluation of adnexal masses.
Kushtagi P; Kulkarni KK
Singapore Med J; 2008 Dec; 49(12):1017-20. PubMed ID: 19122954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of the risk of malignancy index and the ovarian crescent sign for the diagnosis of invasive ovarian cancer.
Yazbek J; Aslam N; Tailor A; Hillaby K; Raju KS; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 16881074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
Zhang T; Li F; Liu J; Zhang S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Satoskar P; Deshpande A
J Postgrad Med; 1991 Jan; 37(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 1941690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Sonographic diagnosis of presumed benign ovarian tumors].
Marret H; Cayrol M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Dec; 42(8):730-43. PubMed ID: 24200073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative risk stratification of adnexal masses: can we predict the optimal surgical management?
Rogers EM; Casadiego Cubides G; Lacy J; Gerstle JT; Kives S; Allen L
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 27(3):125-8. PubMed ID: 24560684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of benignity of solid adnexal masses.
Wang S; Johnson S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):721-6. PubMed ID: 21858439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Usefulness of color Doppler in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses].
Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Benedetti Panici P; Caruana P; Marana R; Mancuso S
Minerva Ginecol; 1998; 50(7-8):285-90. PubMed ID: 9808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of the adnexal mass in pregnancy.
Goh W; Bohrer J; Zalud I
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 24614018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
