These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20069577)

  • 21. Commentary: is totipotency of a human cell a sufficient reason to exclude its patentability under the European law?
    Vrtovec KT; Vrtovec B
    Stem Cells; 2007 Dec; 25(12):3026-8. PubMed ID: 17761756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patentability issues surrounding antivirals.
    Lu DL; Collison AM; Kowalski TJ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1403-4. PubMed ID: 18066035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies.
    Caulfield T; Cook-Deegan RM; Kieff FS; Walsh JP
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1091-4. PubMed ID: 16964215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The exclusion of diagnostic methods from patentability by the EPC: a case for review?
    Ricker M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1167-8. PubMed ID: 15340482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Harvard mouse--eating into the European patent system?
    Wickremasinghe K
    Australas Biotechnol; 1992 Feb; 2(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 1368031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patenting pluripotence: the next battle for stem cell intellectual property.
    Vrtovec KT; Scott CT
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 26(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 18392018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Germany challenges human stem cell patent awarded 'by mistake'.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6773):3-4. PubMed ID: 10716411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The morality of biotech patents: differing legal obligations in Europe?
    Ford R
    Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1997 Jun; 19(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 16538738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Grant v Commissioner of Patents and patenting knowledge inventions.
    Lawson C
    J Law Med; 2008 Feb; 15(4):626-43. PubMed ID: 18365526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Time waits for no man: deciding when to file a patent application in Europe.
    White NL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jun; 25(6):639-41. PubMed ID: 17557096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Harvard squeaks through oncomouse patent appeal.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6861):241. PubMed ID: 11713493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Material witness: patent pending.
    Ball P
    Nat Mater; 2003 Jun; 2(6):365. PubMed ID: 12776101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Faculty and employee ownership of inventions in Australia.
    McBratney A; Tarr JA
    Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 28(10):1019-22. PubMed ID: 20944586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethics and the directive for the legal protection of biotechnological inventions.
    Scott-Ram N
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Jan; No. 124():25-8. PubMed ID: 11655055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patenting pathways.
    Kleiman MJ; Sontag LB
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jun; 24(6):616-7; author reply 617-8. PubMed ID: 16763583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Innovation and intellectual property rights in systems biology.
    Allarakhia M; Wensley A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Dec; 23(12):1485-8. PubMed ID: 16333286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patenting inventions in the field of biology and chemistry: German and European patent law and case law.
    Vossius V
    Naturwissenschaften; 1997 Oct; 84(10):431-43. PubMed ID: 9394296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are natural gene sequences patentable?
    Becker KB
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2000 Jun; 73 Suppl():S19-22. PubMed ID: 10968555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parts, property and sharing.
    Henkel J; Maurer SM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Dec; 27(12):1095-8. PubMed ID: 20010583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patenting human beings: do sub-human creatures deserve constitutional protection?
    Fishman RE
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):461-82. PubMed ID: 2699160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.