These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20070294)

  • 1. Simplified Bayesian sensitivity analysis for mismeasured and unobserved confounders.
    Gustafson P; McCandless LC; Levy AR; Richardson S
    Biometrics; 2010 Dec; 66(4):1129-37. PubMed ID: 20070294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy A
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2331-47. PubMed ID: 16998821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
    Hossain S; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hierarchical Bayesian estimates of distributed MEG sources: theoretical aspects and comparison of variational and MCMC methods.
    Nummenmaa A; Auranen T; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Sams M; Vehtari A
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(2):669-85. PubMed ID: 17300961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.
    McCandless LC; Somers JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):515-531. PubMed ID: 28882092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applying diffusion-based Markov chain Monte Carlo.
    Herbei R; Paul R; Berliner LM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173453. PubMed ID: 28301529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2887-2901. PubMed ID: 28386994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18226747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods: an example from evaluation of diagnostic tests in absence of a gold standard.
    Toft N; Innocent GT; Gettinby G; Reid SW
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 May; 79(2-4):244-56. PubMed ID: 17292499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for computing multivariate maximum likelihood estimates and posterior distributions: mixture dose-response assessment.
    Li R; Englehardt JD; Li X
    Risk Anal; 2012 Feb; 32(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 21906114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring heterogeneity in tumour data using Markov chain Monte Carlo.
    de Gunst MC; Dewanji A; Luebeck EG
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(10):1691-707. PubMed ID: 12720305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Metropolis Monte Carlo implementation of bayesian time-domain parameter estimation: application to coupling constant estimation from antiphase multiplets.
    Andrec M; Prestegard JH
    J Magn Reson; 1998 Feb; 130(2):217-32. PubMed ID: 9500892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data.
    Jun SC; George JS; Paré-Blagoev J; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM; Wood CC
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 28(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 16023866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian inference.
    Bois FY
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 930():597-636. PubMed ID: 23086859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees.
    Mossel E; Vigoda E
    Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5744):2207-9. PubMed ID: 16195459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
    Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics.
    Nylander JA; Wilgenbusch JC; Warren DL; Swofford DL
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(4):581-3. PubMed ID: 17766271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):94-112. PubMed ID: 19012268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian approach to DNA sequence segmentation.
    Boys RJ; Henderson DA
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):573-81; discussion 581-8. PubMed ID: 15339274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multistability and perceptual inference.
    Gershman SJ; Vul E; Tenenbaum JB
    Neural Comput; 2012 Jan; 24(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 22023198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.