These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20070544)

  • 1. Insulation damage in a shock wire: an unexpected fluoroscopic image.
    Valk S; Luijten R; Jordaens L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Jun; 33(6):770-2. PubMed ID: 20070544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Downloadable algorithm to reduce inappropriate shocks caused by fractures of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.
    Swerdlow CD; Gunderson BD; Ousdigian KT; Abeyratne A; Stadler RW; Gillberg JM; Patel AS; Ellenbogen KA
    Circulation; 2008 Nov; 118(21):2122-9. PubMed ID: 18981299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential role of home monitoring to reduce inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients due to lead failure.
    Spencker S; Coban N; Koch L; Schirdewan A; Müller D
    Europace; 2009 Apr; 11(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 19103654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Downloadable software algorithm reduces inappropriate shocks caused by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fractures: a prospective study.
    Swerdlow CD; Gunderson BD; Ousdigian KT; Abeyratne A; Sachanandani H; Ellenbogen KA
    Circulation; 2010 Oct; 122(15):1449-55. PubMed ID: 20876433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Premature failure of a Riata defibrillator lead without impedance change or inappropriate sensing: a case report and review of the literature.
    Krebsbach A; Alhumaid F; Henrikson CA; Calkins H; Berger RD; Cheng A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1070-2. PubMed ID: 21385268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic R-wave and impedance testing with the modern patient alert system to reduce inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks due to lead fracture.
    Chinushi M; Hosaka Y; Ikarashi N; Iijima K; Furushima H; Aizawa Y
    Europace; 2008 Jun; 10(6):738-40. PubMed ID: 18390874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact.
    Daubert JP; Zareba W; Cannom DS; McNitt S; Rosero SZ; Wang P; Schuger C; Steinberg JS; Higgins SL; Wilber DJ; Klein H; Andrews ML; Hall WJ; Moss AJ;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Apr; 51(14):1357-65. PubMed ID: 18387436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implantable cardiac defibrillator lead failure or myopotential oversensing? An approach to the diagnosis of noise on lead electrograms.
    Kowalski M; Ellenbogen KA; Wood MA; Friedman PL
    Europace; 2008 Aug; 10(8):914-7. PubMed ID: 18565976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation of advanced heart failure symptoms to risk of inappropriate defibrillator shocks.
    Hreybe H; Ezzeddine R; Barrington W; Bazaz R; Jain S; Ngwu O; Saba S
    Am J Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 97(4):544-6. PubMed ID: 16461053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock due to external alternating current leak: report of two cases.
    Chan NY; Wai-Ling Ho L
    Europace; 2005 Mar; 7(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 15763537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of subacute and delayed right ventricular perforation with a pacing or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.
    Laborderie J; Barandon L; Ploux S; Deplagne A; Mokrani B; Reuter S; Le Gal F; Jais P; Haissaguerre M; Clementy J; Bordachar P
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1352-5. PubMed ID: 18993154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Death due to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
    Messali A; Thomas O; Chauvin M; Coumel P; Leenhardt A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Aug; 15(8):953-6. PubMed ID: 15333095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple appropriate and spurious defibrillator shocks in a patient with right ventricular cardiomyopathy.
    Strohmer B; Schernthaner C; Pichler M
    Int J Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 102(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 15982515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early automatic remote detection of combined lead insulation defect and ICD damage.
    Neuzil P; Taborsky M; Holy F; Wallbrueck K
    Europace; 2008 May; 10(5):556-7. PubMed ID: 18227352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An unusual mechanism causing inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks: transient reduction in R-wave amplitude.
    Baranchuk A; Ribas S; Divakaramenon S; Morillo CA
    Europace; 2007 Aug; 9(8):694-6. PubMed ID: 17478463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Insulation Failure of the Linox Defibrillator Lead: A Case Report and Retrospective Review of a Single Center Experience.
    Howe AJ; McKeag NA; Wilson CM; Ashfield KP; Roberts MJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):686-9. PubMed ID: 25711237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inappropriate shock delivery by implantable cardioverter defibrillator due to electrical interference with washing machine.
    Chongtham DS; Bahl A; Kumar RM; Talwar KK
    Int J Cardiol; 2007 May; 118(2):e44-5. PubMed ID: 17395291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impedance changes on defibrillation coils after atrial fibrillation ablation: lead damage or electromechanical interference?
    Vanga SR; Bommana S; Kroll M; Lakkireddy D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 35(6):e163-6. PubMed ID: 21029124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic impedance monitoring and patient alert feature in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: being alert for the unexpected!
    Duru F; Luechinger R; Scharf C; Brunckhorst C
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 15828892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).
    Day JD; Doshi RN; Belott P; Birgersdotter-Green U; Behboodikhah M; Ott P; Glatter KA; Tobias S; Frumin H; Lee BK; Merillat J; Wiener I; Wang S; Grogin H; Chun S; Patrawalla R; Crandall B; Osborn JS; Weiss JP; Lappe DL; Neuman S
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):2382-9. PubMed ID: 17470697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.