194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20070762)
1. Can we perceptually rate alaryngeal voice? Developing the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Voice Perceptual Scale.
Hurren A; Hildreth AJ; Carding PN
Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20070762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual Assessment of Tracheoesophageal Voice Quality With the SToPS: The Development of a Reliable and Valid Tool.
Hurren A; Miller N; Carding P
J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):465-472. PubMed ID: 30072205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech.
Kazi R; Kiverniti E; Prasad V; Venkitaraman R; Nutting CM; Clarke P; Rhys-Evans P; Harrington KJ
Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 17184457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of perceptions of voice quality: evidence from a problem asthma clinic population.
Sellars C; Stanton AE; McConnachie A; Dunnet CP; Chapman LM; Bucknall CE; MacKenzie K
J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):755-63. PubMed ID: 19250586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Investigation of Reliability of the Sunderland Tracheosophageal Voice Perceptual Scale.
Coffey MM; Tolley N; Howard D; Hickson M
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2019; 71(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 30513519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability and validity of patient self-rating of their own voice quality.
Lee M; Drinnan M; Carding P
Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 30(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 16209679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Perceptive evaluation of substitution voices: the I(I) NFVo rating scale].
Moerman M; Martens JP; Crevier-Buchman L; Woisard V; Dejonckere P
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(5):323-5. PubMed ID: 16676554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T
Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.
Bele IV
J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):555-73. PubMed ID: 16301102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of alaryngeal speech using a sound-producing voice prosthesis in relation to sex and pharyngoesophageal segment tonicity.
van der Torn M; van Gogh CD; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Verkerke GJ; Mahieu HF
Head Neck; 2006 May; 28(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 16470874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech by naive and experienced judges through the use of semantic differential scales.
van As CJ; Koopmans-van Beinum FJ; Pols LC; Hilgers FJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Aug; 46(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 12959472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual Evaluation of the Tracheoesophageal Voice: Italian Validation of the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Perceptual Scale.
D'Alatri L; Longobardi Y; Marchese MR; Meschini C; Figliolia D; Mari G; Rodolico D; Parrilla C; Galli J
J Voice; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38040498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders.
Karnell MP; Melton SD; Childes JM; Coleman TC; Dailey SA; Hoffman HT
J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):576-90. PubMed ID: 16822648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a voice prosthesis questionnaire to assess valved speech and its related issues in patients following total laryngectomy.
Kazi R; Singh A; De Cordova J; Al-Mutairy A; Clarke P; Nutting C; Rhys-Evans P; Harrington K
Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Oct; 31(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 17014450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.
Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Fernandes ACN; de Souza Medved DM; da Silva EM; Júnior FB
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):774.e1-774.e8. PubMed ID: 28318969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech and voice after laryngectomy: perceptual and acoustical analyses of tracheoesophageal speech related to voice handicap index.
Lundström E; Hammarberg B
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 20938189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
