These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20070959)

  • 1. The cost of being watched: Stroop interference increases under concomitant eye contact.
    Conty L; Gimmig D; Belletier C; George N; Huguet P
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 20070959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The mere perception of eye contact increases arousal during a word-spelling task.
    Conty L; Russo M; Loehr V; Hugueville L; Barbu S; Huguet P; Tijus C; George N
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 19823960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enduring cognitive dysfunction in unipolar major depression: a test-retest study using the Stroop paradigm.
    Hammar A; Sørensen L; Ardal G; Oedegaard KJ; Kroken R; Roness A; Lund A
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 51(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 20042028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: now you see it, now you don't.
    Costa A; Hernández M; Costa-Faidella J; Sebastián-Gallés N
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):135-49. PubMed ID: 19729156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individualized EEG source reconstruction of Stroop interference with masked color words.
    Bruchmann M; Herper K; Konrad C; Pantev C; Huster RJ
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1800-9. PubMed ID: 19781651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developmental differences in cognitive control of socio-affective processing.
    Barnes KA; Kaplan LA; Vaidya CJ
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2007; 32(3):787-807. PubMed ID: 17956182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upper-left gaze bias reveals competing search strategies in a reverse Stroop task.
    Durgin FH; Doyle E; Egan L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):428-48. PubMed ID: 17900514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A sensory origin for color-word stroop effects in aging: simulating age-related changes in color-vision mimics age-related changes in Stroop.
    Ben-David BM; Schneider BA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Nov; 17(6):730-46. PubMed ID: 21058053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tracking eye movements to localize Stroop interference in naming: word planning versus articulatory buffering.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1332-47. PubMed ID: 24749961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stroop effects in persons with traumatic brain injury: selective attention, speed of processing, or color-naming? A meta-analysis.
    Ben-David BM; Nguyen LL; van Lieshout PH
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2011 Mar; 17(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 21320377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation.
    Lansbergen MM; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2247-54. PubMed ID: 18762447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transitions between color categories mapped with a reverse Stroop task.
    Smithson HE; Khan SS; Sharpe LT; Stockman A
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16961980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social anhedonia associated with poor evaluative processing but not with poor cognitive control.
    Martin EA; Kerns JG
    Psychiatry Res; 2010 Jul; 178(2):419-24. PubMed ID: 20493541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task.
    Hanslmayr S; Pastötter B; Bäuml KH; Gruber S; Wimber M; Klimesch W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 18275330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of multiple sclerosis on patients' performance on the Stroop Test: processing speed versus interference.
    Denney DR; Lynch SG
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 May; 15(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 19402931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contingency learning and unlearning in the blink of an eye: a resource dependent process.
    Schmidt JR; Houwer JD; Besner D
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):235-50. PubMed ID: 20116294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.