210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20071271)
1. Investigation of rotational skin stretch for proprioceptive feedback with application to myoelectric systems.
Wheeler J; Bark K; Savall J; Cutkosky M
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Feb; 18(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 20071271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. HapPro: A Wearable Haptic Device for Proprioceptive Feedback.
Rossi M; Bianchi M; Battaglia E; Catalano MG; Bicchi A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Jan; 66(1):138-149. PubMed ID: 29993527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method to reversibly degrade proprioceptive feedback in research on human motor control.
Bock O; Pipereit K; Mierau A
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Mar; 160(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 17092562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intelligent multifunction myoelectric control of hand prostheses.
Light CM; Chappell PH; Hudgins B; Engelhart K
J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 12396328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cineplasty as a control input for externally powered prosthetic components.
Weir RF; Heckathorne CW; Childress DS
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 11563487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A haptic feedback system for lower-limb prostheses.
Fan RE; Culjat MO; King CH; Franco ML; Boryk R; Bisley JW; Dutson E; Grundfest WS
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2008 Jun; 16(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 18586606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial proprioceptive feedback for myoelectric control.
Pistohl T; Joshi D; Ganesh G; Jackson A; Nazarpour K
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 May; 23(3):498-507. PubMed ID: 25216484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets.
Goble DJ; Brown SH
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 99(6):3063-74. PubMed ID: 18436632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of muscle fatigue as assessed by electromyography and mechanomyography during continuous and intermittent low-force contractions: effects of the feedback mode.
Madeleine P; Jørgensen LV; Søgaard K; Arendt-Nielsen L; Sjøgaard G
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 May; 87(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 12012073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multichannel Electrotactile Feedback With Spatial and Mixed Coding for Closed-Loop Control of Grasping Force in Hand Prostheses.
Dosen S; Markovic M; Strbac M; Belic M; Kojic V; Bijelic G; Keller T; Farina D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Mar; 25(3):183-195. PubMed ID: 27071179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Portable haptic device for lower limb amputee gait feedback: Assessing static and dynamic perceptibility.
Husman MAB; Maqbool HF; Awad MI; Dehghani-Sanij AA
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1562-1566. PubMed ID: 28814042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Magnetorheological fluid in a force feedback glove.
Winter SH; Bouzit M
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Mar; 15(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 17436869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental development of a sensory control system for an upper limb myoelectric prosthesis with cosmetic covering.
Tura A; Lamberti C; Davalli A; Sacchetti R
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 9505249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Portable Sensory Augmentation Device for Balance Rehabilitation Using Fingertip Skin Stretch Feedback.
Pan YT; Yoon HU; Hur P
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jan; 25(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 26992163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements.
Scheidt RA; Conditt MA; Secco EL; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3200-13. PubMed ID: 15659526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A design of hardware haptic interface for gastrointestinal endoscopy simulation.
Gu Y; Lee DY
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():199-201. PubMed ID: 21335788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Force matching errors following eccentric exercise.
Proske U; Gregory JE; Morgan DL; Percival P; Weerakkody NS; Canny BJ
Hum Mov Sci; 2004 Oct; 23(3-4):365-78. PubMed ID: 15541523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback.
Brindle TJ; Nitz AJ; Uhl TL; Kifer E; Shapiro R
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Jun; 16(3):236-49. PubMed ID: 16111896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial proprioception for myoelectric control.
Pistohl T; Jackson A; Gowrishankar G; Joshi D; Nazarpour K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1595-8. PubMed ID: 24110007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advantages of externally powered prosthesis with feedback system using pseudo-cineplasty.
Nambu S; Ikebuchi M; Taniguchi M; Park CS; Kitagawa T; Nakajima S; Koike T
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(7):1095-102. PubMed ID: 25436660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
