154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20071307)
1. [Gene expression based multigene prognostic and predictive tests in breast cancer].
Pénzváltó Z; Mihály Z; Gyorffy B
Magy Onkol; 2009 Dec; 53(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 20071307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is gene array testing to be considered routine now?
Paik S
Breast; 2011 Oct; 20 Suppl 3():S87-91. PubMed ID: 22015300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gene expression profiles of breast cancer obtained from core cut biopsies before neoadjuvant docetaxel, adriamycin, and cyclophoshamide chemotherapy correlate with routine prognostic markers and could be used to identify predictive signatures.
Rody A; Karn T; Gätje R; Kourtis K; Minckwitz G; Loibl S; Munnes M; Ruckhäberle E; Holtrich U; Kaufmann M; Ahr A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16673249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multigene classifiers, prognostic factors, and predictors of breast cancer clinical outcome.
Ross JS
Adv Anat Pathol; 2009 Jul; 16(4):204-15. PubMed ID: 19546609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic role of a multigene reverse transcriptase-PCR assay in patients with node-negative breast cancer not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy.
Esteva FJ; Sahin AA; Cristofanilli M; Coombes K; Lee SJ; Baker J; Cronin M; Walker M; Watson D; Shak S; Hortobagyi GN
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 May; 11(9):3315-9. PubMed ID: 15867229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor gene expression and prognosis in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes.
Cobleigh MA; Tabesh B; Bitterman P; Baker J; Cronin M; Liu ML; Borchik R; Mosquera JM; Walker MG; Shak S
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Dec; 11(24 Pt 1):8623-31. PubMed ID: 16361546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Commercialized multigene predictors of clinical outcome for breast cancer.
Ross JS; Hatzis C; Symmans WF; Pusztai L; Hortobágyi GN
Oncologist; 2008 May; 13(5):477-93. PubMed ID: 18515733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between c-myc amplification and pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Yasojima H; Shimomura A; Naoi Y; Kishi K; Baba Y; Shimazu K; Nakayama T; Kim SJ; Tamaki Y; Noguchi S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 Aug; 47(12):1779-88. PubMed ID: 21741827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gene expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and microtubule-associated protein Tau in high-risk early breast cancer: a quest for molecular predictors of treatment benefit in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group trial.
Pentheroudakis G; Kalogeras KT; Wirtz RM; Grimani I; Zografos G; Gogas H; Stropp U; Pectasides D; Skarlos D; Hennig G; Samantas E; Bafaloukos D; Papakostas P; Kalofonos HP; Pavlidis N; Fountzilas G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jul; 116(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 18668363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the Oncotype DX assay necessary in strongly estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers?
Lee JJ; Shen J
Am Surg; 2011 Oct; 77(10):1364-7. PubMed ID: 22127090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in endocrine responsive, early breast cancer using multigene assays.
Albain KS; Paik S; van't Veer L
Breast; 2009 Oct; 18 Suppl 3():S141-5. PubMed ID: 19914534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrating molecular profiling, histological type and other variables: defining the fingerprint of responsiveness to treatment.
Viale G
Breast; 2009 Oct; 18 Suppl 3():S32-6. PubMed ID: 19914539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinct p53 gene signatures are needed to predict prognosis and response to chemotherapy in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers.
Coutant C; Rouzier R; Qi Y; Lehmann-Che J; Bianchini G; Iwamoto T; Hortobagyi GN; Symmans WF; Uzan S; Andre F; de Thé H; Pusztai L
Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Apr; 17(8):2591-601. PubMed ID: 21248301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metastatic potential of T1 breast cancer can be predicted by the 70-gene MammaPrint signature.
Mook S; Knauer M; Bueno-de-Mesquita JM; Retel VP; Wesseling J; Linn SC; Van't Veer LJ; Rutgers EJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 May; 17(5):1406-13. PubMed ID: 20094918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expression of KLF5 is a prognostic factor for disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with breast cancer.
Tong D; Czerwenka K; Heinze G; Ryffel M; Schuster E; Witt A; Leodolter S; Zeillinger R
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 12(8):2442-8. PubMed ID: 16638850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical experience of using Oncotype DX as an additional treatment decision tool in early breast cancer - a retrospective analysis from 5 Greek institutions.
Markopoulos C; Xepapadakis G; Venizelos V; Tsiftsoglou A; Misitzis J; Panoussis D; Antonopoulou Z; Stathoulopoulou M; Zobolas V; Gogas H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 38(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 22425282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Triple-negative phenotype is of adverse prognostic value in patients treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy: a translational research analysis in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) randomized phase III trial.
Skarlos P; Christodoulou C; Kalogeras KT; Eleftheraki AG; Bobos M; Batistatou A; Valavanis C; Tzaida O; Timotheadou E; Kronenwett R; Wirtz RM; Kostopoulos I; Televantou D; Koutselini E; Papaspirou I; Papadimitriou CA; Pectasides D; Gogas H; Aravantinos G; Pavlidis N; Arapantoni P; Skarlos DV; Fountzilas G
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 69(2):533-46. PubMed ID: 21901395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current status of prognostic profiling in breast cancer.
Pusztai L
Oncologist; 2008 Apr; 13(4):350-60. PubMed ID: 18448548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.
Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is immunohistochemistry less sensitive than quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for hormone receptor status determination in breast cancer?
Arnould L; Coudert B; Fumoleau P
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 27(16):2733; author reply 2734-5. PubMed ID: 19380432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
