138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20071741)
1. Waved aCGH: to smooth or not to smooth.
Leprêtre F; Villenet C; Quief S; Nibourel O; Jacquemin C; Troussard X; Jardin F; Gibson F; Kerckaert JP; Roumier C; Figeac M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Apr; 38(7):e94. PubMed ID: 20071741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A GC-wave correction algorithm that improves the analytical performance of aCGH.
Leo A; Walker AM; Lebo MS; Hendrickson B; Scholl T; Akmaev VR
J Mol Diagn; 2012 Nov; 14(6):550-9. PubMed ID: 22922130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A very fast and accurate method for calling aberrations in array-CGH data.
Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Paravidino R; Zara F; Bricarelli FD; Torricelli F; Magi A
Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):515-8. PubMed ID: 20207682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Systems Biology Interpretation of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) Data through Phylogenetics.
Abunimer AN; Salazar J; Noursi DP; Abu-Asab MS
OMICS; 2016 Mar; 20(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 26983023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Zoom-in array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to detect germline rearrangements in cancer susceptibility genes.
Staaf J; Borg A
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 653():221-35. PubMed ID: 20721746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-cell copy number variation detection.
Cheng J; Vanneste E; Konings P; Voet T; Vermeesch JR; Moreau Y
Genome Biol; 2011 Aug; 12(8):R80. PubMed ID: 21854607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stationary wavelet packet transform and dependent laplacian bivariate shrinkage estimator for array-CGH data smoothing.
Nguyen N; Huang H; Oraintara S; Vo A
J Comput Biol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 20078226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Agilent 244K oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization platform for clinical cytogenetic diagnosis.
Yu S; Bittel DC; Kibiryeva N; Zwick DL; Cooley LD
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Sep; 132(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 19687311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization of cancer targets reveals novel, recurrent genetic aberrations in the myelodysplastic syndromes.
Kolquist KA; Schultz RA; Furrow A; Brown TC; Han JY; Campbell LJ; Wall M; Slovak ML; Shaffer LG; Ballif BC
Cancer Genet; 2011 Nov; 204(11):603-28. PubMed ID: 22200086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. De Novo identification of single nucleotide mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans using array comparative genomic hybridization.
Maydan JS; Okada HM; Flibotte S; Edgley ML; Moerman DG
Genetics; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1673-7. PubMed ID: 19189945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization as a tool for analyzing the leukemia genome.
Strefford JC; Parker H
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 538():151-77. PubMed ID: 19277573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A shifting level model algorithm that identifies aberrations in array-CGH data.
Magi A; Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Scordo MR; Torricelli F
Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 19948744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CGHpower: exploring sample size calculations for chromosomal copy number experiments.
Scheinin I; Ferreira JA; Knuutila S; Meijer GA; van de Wiel MA; Ylstra B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 11():331. PubMed ID: 20565750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.
Park JH; Woo JH; Shim SH; Yang SJ; Choi YM; Yang KS; Cha DH
BMC Med Genet; 2010 Jun; 11():102. PubMed ID: 20576126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ADaCGH: A parallelized web-based application and R package for the analysis of aCGH data.
Díaz-Uriarte R; Rueda OM
PLoS One; 2007 Aug; 2(8):e737. PubMed ID: 17710137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robust unmixing of tumor states in array comparative genomic hybridization data.
Tolliver D; Tsourakakis C; Subramanian A; Shackney S; Schwartz R
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i106-14. PubMed ID: 20529894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Array comparative genomic hybridisation testing in CHD.
Hightower HB; Robin NH; Mikhail FM; Ambalavanan N
Cardiol Young; 2015 Aug; 25(6):1155-72. PubMed ID: 25296170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental design and data analysis for array comparative genomic hybridization.
Park PJ
Cancer Invest; 2008 Nov; 26(9):923-8. PubMed ID: 19034774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of Copy-Number Alterations in Single Cells Using Microarray-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH).
Möhlendick B; Stoecklein NH
Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2014 Dec; 65():22.19.1-23. PubMed ID: 25447076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can genome array screening replace FISH as a front-line test in multiple myeloma?
Boneva T; Brazma D; Gancheva K; Howard-Reeves J; Raynov J; Grace C; Nacheva EP
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2014 Aug; 53(8):676-92. PubMed ID: 24757046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
