BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20072024)

  • 1. Automated landmark extraction for orthodontic measurement of faces using the 3-camera photogrammetry methodology.
    Deli R; Di Gioia E; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20072024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurate facial morphologic measurements using a 3-camera photogrammetric method.
    Deli R; Gioia ED; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 21187775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Method selection in craniofacial measurements: advantages and disadvantages of 3D digitization method.
    Ozsoy U; Demirel BM; Yildirim FB; Tosun O; Sarikcioglu L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 19179087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Assessment of precision and accuracy of digital surface photogrammetry with the DSP 400 system].
    Krimmel M; Kluba S; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Mar; 50(3):45-53. PubMed ID: 15832575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereo-assisted landmark detection for the analysis of changes in 3-D facial shape.
    Naftel AJ; Trenouth MJ
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2004 Jun; 29(2):137-55. PubMed ID: 15370994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design, construction, and testing of a stereo-photogrammetric tool for the diagnosis of fetal alcohol syndrome in infants.
    Mutsvangwa TE; Smit J; Hoyme HE; Kalberg W; Viljoen DL; Meintjes EM; Douglas TS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1448-58. PubMed ID: 19336298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application.
    Lübbers HT; Medinger L; Kruse A; Grätz KW; Matthews F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):763-7. PubMed ID: 20485043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noninvasive computerized scanning method for the correlation between the facial soft and hard tissues for an integrated three-dimensional anthropometry and cephalometry.
    Galantucci LM; Percoco G; Lavecchia F; Di Gioia E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):797-804. PubMed ID: 23714883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical validation of the Di3D stereophotogrammetry surface imaging system.
    Winder RJ; Darvann TA; McKnight W; Magee JD; Ramsay-Baggs P
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 17980940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images.
    Wong JY; Oh AK; Ohta E; Hunt AT; Rogers GF; Mulliken JB; Deutsch CK
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 May; 45(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 18452351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.
    Baik HS; Lee HJ; Lee KJ
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16548301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
    Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation.
    Rosati R; De Menezes M; Rossetti A; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 20620838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of facial soft tissue measurements on three-dimensional images and models obtained with different methods.
    Germec-Cakan D; Canter HI; Nur B; Arun T
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 21(5):1393-9. PubMed ID: 20856027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems.
    Fourie Z; Damstra J; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Apr; 207(1-3):127-34. PubMed ID: 20951517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.