199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20072087)
1. Sociodemographics, referral patterns, and Internet use for decision-making in microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Matros E; Yueh JH; Bar-Meir ED; Slavin SA; Tobias AM; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Apr; 125(4):1087-1094. PubMed ID: 20072087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon.
Damen TH; Morritt AN; Zhong T; Ahmad J; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: a U.S. population-based study.
Albornoz CR; Bach PB; Pusic AL; McCarthy CM; Mehrara BJ; Disa JJ; Cordeiro PG; Matros E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 May; 129(5):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 22544091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The reconstructive journey: Description of the breast reconstruction pathway in a high-volume UK-based microsurgical centre.
Moller L; Berner JE; Dheansa B
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Dec; 72(12):1930-1935. PubMed ID: 31628083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unilateral failures in bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction.
Rao SS; Parikh PM; Goldstein JA; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jul; 126(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 20595829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
Bennett KG; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):901-908. PubMed ID: 29926077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps.
Mehrara BJ; Santoro TD; Arcilla E; Watson JP; Shaw WW; Da Lio AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Oct; 118(5):1100-1109. PubMed ID: 17016173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction.
Visser NJ; Damen THC; Timman R; Hofer SOP; Mureau MAM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jul; 126(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 20595835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of autologous fat grafting in secondary microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Weichman KE; Broer PN; Tanna N; Wilson SC; Allan A; Levine JP; Ahn C; Choi M; Karp NS; Allen R
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 23788122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Physician Payments on Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: An All-Payer Claim Database Analysis.
Panchal H; Shamsunder MG; Sheinin A; Sheckter CC; Berlin NL; Nelson JA; Allen R; Rubin D; Kozlow JH; Matros E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 31985616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Quality of Life following Breast Reconstruction in Thin Patients: A Comparison between Microsurgical and Prosthetic Implant Recipients.
Weichman KE; Broer PN; Thanik VD; Wilson SC; Tanna N; Levine JP; Choi M; Karp NS; Hazen A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Aug; 136(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 25909301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.
Gurunluoglu R; Gurunluoglu A; Williams SA; Tebockhorst S
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 21862916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate breast reconstruction in the West Midlands: a survey of current practice.
McManus P; Sterne GD; Fatah F; Lee MJ
Br J Plast Surg; 2003 Sep; 56(6):567-70. PubMed ID: 12946375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of regional referral centers for microsurgical breast reconstruction: the New England perforator flap program experience.
Yueh JH; Slavin SA; Bar-Meir ED; Merali HS; Houlihan MJ; Gautam S; Morris DJ; Tobias AM; Lee BT
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Feb; 208(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 19228537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Free flap breast reconstruction: the LSU experience (1984-1996).
Allen R; Guarda H; Wall F; Dupin C; Glass C
J La State Med Soc; 1997 Oct; 149(10):388-92. PubMed ID: 9347636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Female plastic and reconstructive surgeons' personal decision making for breast cancer treatment and reconstruction.
Al-Benna S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 20978776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perforator flaps in breast reconstruction.
Tseng CY; Lipa JE
Clin Plast Surg; 2010 Oct; 37(4):641-54, vi-ii. PubMed ID: 20816519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer.
Alderman AK; Hawley ST; Waljee J; Mujahid M; Morrow M; Katz SJ
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 18157830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstructive management of contralateral breast cancer in patients who previously underwent unilateral breast reconstruction.
Chang DW; Kroll SS; Dackiw A; Singletary SE; Robb GL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Aug; 108(2):352-8; discussion 359-60. PubMed ID: 11496174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates.
Ng RL; Youssef A; Kronowitz SJ; Lipa JE; Potochny J; Reece GP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):374-84; discussion 385-8. PubMed ID: 15277802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
