107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2007243)
1. The fee-for-service system should be replaced.
Wright CJ
CMAJ; 1991 Apr; 144(7):900-3. PubMed ID: 2007243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fee-for-service: cashing in on the Canadian medical care system.
York G
J Public Health Policy; 1992; 13(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 1644901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physician bonuses: tarnished awards?
Marcille JA
Manag Care; 1994 Mar; 3(3):14-8, 24. PubMed ID: 10140026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fee-for-service the worst system.
Potter GE
CMAJ; 1994 Aug; 151(3):272-3. PubMed ID: 8039077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can money buy quality? Physician response to pay for performance.
Bodenheimer T; May JH; Berenson RA; Coughlan J
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 2005 Dec; (102):1-4. PubMed ID: 16465698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual incentives to fix organizational problems?
Gray BH
Med Care Res Rev; 2004 Sep; 61(3 Suppl):76S-9S. PubMed ID: 15375285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Do financial incentives stifle doctor satisfaction?
Capitation Rates Data; 1999 Feb; 4(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 10346246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Community health centres: do they pose a threat to fee-for-service medicine?
Morgan PP; Cohen L
CMAJ; 1991 Mar; 144(6):765-8. PubMed ID: 1998937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pay for performance and the revolution in American medical culture.
Lexa FJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 18312963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pay-for-performance: show me the (value of) money.
Amerling R
Nephrol News Issues; 2005 Jul; 19(8):78-9, 83. PubMed ID: 16104347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of managed care on quality of healthcare: theory and evidence.
Cangialose CB; Cary SJ; Hoffman LH; Ballard DJ
Am J Manag Care; 1997 Aug; 3(8):1153-70. PubMed ID: 10170299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HMO physicians' shared risk pools are dangerous to patients' health.
Bronow R
Healthspan; 1993 Jan; 10(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 10124291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonprimary care physicians' views on office-based quality incentive and improvement programs.
Murphy KM; Nash DB
Am J Med Qual; 2008; 23(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 19001100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physicians' fee schedule is a deterrent to quality care.
Fagan AE
Dimens Health Serv; 1974 Jul; 51(7):4. PubMed ID: 4152277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Paying physicians for high-quality care.
Graap RF
N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(18):1910-2; author reply 1910-2. PubMed ID: 15122816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do physician remuneration schemes matter? The case of Canadian family physicians.
Devlin RA; Sarma S
J Health Econ; 2008 Sep; 27(5):1168-81. PubMed ID: 18586341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NY health plan, doctors partner on pay for performance system.
Perform Improv Advis; 2005 Apr; 9(4):37-40. PubMed ID: 15945290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Incentive strategies reward winners, discourage sinners.
Capitation Manag Rep; 1998 Nov; 5(11):161-6. PubMed ID: 10338918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. By the numbers. Managed care techniques: the physician view.
Stanton M
Healthplan; 1998; 39(2):65-6. PubMed ID: 10181743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The fee-for-service system should be replaced.
Baltzan MA
CMAJ; 1991 Oct; 145(7):763-7. PubMed ID: 1913402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
