107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2007243)
21. Compensating physicians in a mixed fee-for-service/capitated practice.
Erra RJ
Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1994 Mar; 6(2):12-7. PubMed ID: 10133042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. California Blue Cross redirects incentive dollars from UM to quality.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2001 Sep; 8(9):140-2, 129. PubMed ID: 11577503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of health insurance on physicians' fees.
Sloan FA
J Hum Resour; 1982; 17(4):533-57. PubMed ID: 7175166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The impact of physician financial incentives on high-risk populations in managed care.
Hillman AL
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol; 1995; 8 Suppl 1():S23-30. PubMed ID: 7834412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Point: Should tele-ICU services be eligible for professional fee billing? Yes. Tele-ICUs and the triple aim.
McCambridge MM; Tracy JA; Sample GA
Chest; 2011 Oct; 140(4):847-849. PubMed ID: 21972379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Fee-for-service vs alternative delivery systems.
N C Med J; 1986 Apr; 47(4):181-3. PubMed ID: 3459024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality and physician compensation: performance-based incentives in managed care.
Schlackman N
Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1994 Mar; 6(2):18-23. PubMed ID: 10133043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Eliminating bad, bad medicine: problems with P4P initiatives.
McDonald R
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2008 Aug; 108(8):465-8. PubMed ID: 18723465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality-based physician pay gets off to a slow start.
Stevens L
Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1998 Jan; 7(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10176599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Keystone Mercy expands capitation payments to PCPs.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2005 Feb; 12(2):17-8, 1. PubMed ID: 15856688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Gainsharing in health care: meeting the quality-of-care challenge.
Jain SH; Roble D
Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Mar; 62(3):72-8. PubMed ID: 19097610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Number of P4P initiatives doubles in last two years.
Capitation Manag Rep; 2005 Jul; 12(7):78-82, 73. PubMed ID: 16117221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stop me before I kill again.
Friedman E
Healthc Forum J; 1998; 41(6):8, 10-2. PubMed ID: 10346621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Utilization management in a mixed-payment environment.
Krohn R; Broffman G
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Feb; 52(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 10176452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hospital-physician gainsharing in cardiology.
Ketcham JD; Furukawa MF
Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(3):803-12. PubMed ID: 18474974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Commentary on "Penetrating the 'black box': financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services," by Douglas A. Conrad and Jon B. Christianson.
Landon BE
Med Care Res Rev; 2004 Sep; 61(3 Suppl):69S-75S. PubMed ID: 15375284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Paying for the best.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2005 May; 101(5):51-3. PubMed ID: 15948525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Pay for performance (P4P).
Leitman M; Adusumilli PS
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 18472703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Utilization control in HMOs.
Debrock L; Arnould RJ
Q Rev Econ Finance; 1992; 32(3):31-53. PubMed ID: 10122876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Counterpoint: Should tele-ICU services be eligible for professional fee billing? No.
Hoffmann S
Chest; 2011 Oct; 140(4):849-851. PubMed ID: 21972380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
