These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20073253)
1. [The latest developments of the mercurial sphygmomanometers' substitute products]. Zhou HW; Shang CH Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2009 Sep; 33(5):386-7. PubMed ID: 20073253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternatives to the mercury sphygmomanometer. Buchanan S; Orris P; Karliner J J Public Health Policy; 2011 Feb; 32(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 21109765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The mercury sphygmomanometer should be abandoned before it is proscribed. Markandu ND; Whitcher F; Arnold A; Carney C J Hum Hypertens; 2000 Jan; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10673728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometers. Electronic readings of blood pressure seem to be higher than readings obtained with mercury sphygmomanometers. Ireland J BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7296):1249. PubMed ID: 11388188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital sphygmomanometer use: an audit. Carney SL; Gillies AH; Smith AJ; Smitham S J Qual Clin Pract; 1995 Mar; 15(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 7757320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings? Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring blood pressure using an automated sphygmomanometer. Wedgbury K; Valler-Jones T Br J Nurs; 2008 Jun12-25; 17(11):714-8. PubMed ID: 18773588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Demise of the mercury sphygmomanometer and the dawning of a new era in blood pressure measurement. O'Brien E Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 12604931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. From mercury sphygmomanometer to electric device on blood pressure measurement: correspondence of Minamata Convention on Mercury. Asayama K; Ohkubo T; Hoshide S; Kario K; Ohya Y; Rakugi H; Umemura S Hypertens Res; 2016 Apr; 39(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 26818650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies. Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lack of sphygmomanometer calibration causes over- and under-detection of hypertension: a computer simulation study. Turner MJ; Irwig L; Bune AJ; Kam PC; Baker AB J Hypertens; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1931-8. PubMed ID: 16957551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometer. Lawes EG BMJ; 2000 Dec; 321(7275):1534. PubMed ID: 11189699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement: sphygmomanometer calibration and beyond. Parati G; Faini A; Castiglioni P J Hypertens; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1915-8. PubMed ID: 16957546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Lax sphygmomanometer standard causes overdetection and underdetection of hypertension: a computer simulation study. Turner MJ; van Schalkwyk JM; Irwig L Blood Press Monit; 2008 Apr; 13(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 18347443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic versus mercury sphygmomanometers. McAll G Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Feb; 54(499):136. PubMed ID: 15046058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer? Pickering TG Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 12604932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An audit of the use of sphygmomanometers. Hussain A; Cox JG Br J Clin Pract; 1996; 50(3):136-7. PubMed ID: 8733331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic sphygmomanometers: are they a source of mercury in hospitals? Colquitt PJ Hypertension; 2002 Mar; 39(3):e21. PubMed ID: 11897776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]