These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20073367)
1. 360 assessment, an easier pill to swallow: implementation of peer assessment for Captain's Career Course students and staff. Sones E US Army Med Dep J; 2009; ():59-63. PubMed ID: 20073367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The appraisal discussion as instrument of leadership and motivation]. Brumm G; Brumm R J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2007 Jun; 5(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 17537044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation of the peer review council. Pedersen A; Crabtree T; Ortiz-Tomei T Medsurg Nurs; 2004 Jun; 13(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 15219165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring leadership: measuring what counts for succession planning. Corso JA Semin Nurse Manag; 2002 Dec; 10(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 12526622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is your feedback system too formal to be effective? Pratt J J Long Term Care Adm; 1995; 23(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 10153247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others' ratings of leadership? Atwater L; Wang M; Smither JW; Fleenor JW J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):876-86. PubMed ID: 19594231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A peer review program for professional nurses. Cohen B; Berube R; Turrentine B J Nurs Staff Dev; 1996; 12(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 8699271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal. Kalb KB; Cherry NM; Kauzloric J; Brender A; Green K; Miyagawa L; Shinoda-Mettler A Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 16684187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Communication: key contributor to effectiveness--a nurse executive responds. Wolf GA J Nurs Adm; 1986 Sep; 16(9):26-8. PubMed ID: 3638337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance review interviews: planning for the future. Umiker W Health Care Superv; 1992 Mar; 10(3):28-35. PubMed ID: 10117109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coaching others for a higher level of performance. Thornby D; Pettrey L Crit Care Nurse; 2005 Feb; Suppl():28-30. PubMed ID: 15747494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of coworkers. 1. The comparison with other coworkers is useful for all]. Gremmel-Thomas E; Petrachi F Pflege Z; 1998 Mar; 51(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 9588340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Staff evaluation: an assessment of approaches. Calkin JD Health Care Superv; 1984 Jul; 2(4):68-78. PubMed ID: 10266420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ongoing review: change of mindset is now needed. Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Aug; 32(8):108-9. PubMed ID: 17763625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How to use the positive reinforcing meeting. Umiker WO MLO Med Lab Obs; 1987 May; 19(5):45-6. PubMed ID: 10281876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review--why and how to do it. Jackson SA Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Where did I go wrong?" Establishing a systematic evaluation process for career and organizational success. Lloyd JS Healthc Exec; 1987; 2(3):18-21. PubMed ID: 10301707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]