246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20074288)
1. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare conventional and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
D'Arcy F; Kirwan C; Qasem Q; O'Keefe M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 20074288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations.
El Awady HE; Ghanem AA; Saleh SM
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 21534496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
He L; Liu A; Manche EE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity between wavefront-guided and aspheric LASIK for myopia.
Goyal JL; Garg A; Arora R; Jain P; Goel Y
J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):777-84. PubMed ID: 25375851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison.
Moshirfar M; Schliesser JA; Chang JC; Oberg TJ; Mifflin MD; Townley R; Livingston MK; Kurz CJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20656157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and aspheric ablation profile with iris registration to correct myopia.
Wu J; Zhong X; Yang B; Wang Z; Yu K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1059-65. PubMed ID: 23809945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of custom ablation and conventional laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Alcon excimer laser.
Villarrubia A; Palacín E; Bains R; Gersol J
Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):971-5. PubMed ID: 19724218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, contralateral eye comparison of myopic LASIK with optimized aspheric or prolate ablations.
Chayet A; Bains HS
J Refract Surg; 2012 Feb; 28(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 22201324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2 wavefront-guided excimer lasers for myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results.
Yu CQ; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 24581773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of therapeutic retreatment of corneal wavefront customized ablation with the SCHWIND CAM: 4-year data.
Aslanides IM; Kolli S; Padroni S; Arba Mosquera S
J Refract Surg; 2012 May; 28(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 22515177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LASIK for myopia and astigmatism using the SCHWIND AMARIS excimer laser: an international multicenter trial.
Arbelaez MC; Aslanides IM; Barraquer C; Carones F; Feuermannova A; Neuhann T; Rozsival P
J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 20163073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wavefront-guided vs wavefront-optimized LASIK: a randomized clinical trial comparing contralateral eyes.
Miraftab M; Seyedian MA; Hashemi H
J Refract Surg; 2011 Apr; 27(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 20839665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Shimizu K; Matsumura K; Komatsu M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1178-86.e1. PubMed ID: 22365084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contralateral eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
He L; Manche EE
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25321951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Topographically guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using a customized aspherical treatment zone.
Dougherty PJ; Waring G; Chayet A; Fischer J; Fant B; Bains HS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1862-71. PubMed ID: 19006731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wavefront- and topography-guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix.
Kanjani N; Jacob S; Agarwal A; Agarwal A; Agarwal S; Agarwal T; Doshi A; Doshi S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):398-402. PubMed ID: 15030830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual outcome and contrast sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy in low to moderate myopia: wavefront-optimized versus conventional methods.
Nassiri N; Safi S; Aghazade Amiri M; Sheibani K; Safi H; Panahi N; Nassiri N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1858-64. PubMed ID: 21852067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Six-month clinical outcomes of customized treatments minimized for depth and time in laser corneal refractive surgery.
Arba-Mosquera S; Arbelaez MC; Merayo-Llovés J
Cornea; 2011 Aug; 30(8):876-88. PubMed ID: 20802317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
