These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20074303)

  • 1. Caveat reporting in ultrasound interpretation of surgical pathology: a comparison of sonographer versus radiologist.
    Garcea G; Mahmoud A; Ong SL; Rees Y; Berry DP; Dennison AR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 16(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 20074303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
    Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, part I].
    Krug B; Böttge M; Coburger S; Reineke T; Zähringer M; V Smekal U; Winnekendonk G; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 12525980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new method of evaluating the quality of radiology reports.
    Lee R; Cohen MD; Jennings GS
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 16428061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiology by nonradiologists: is report documentation adequate?
    Weiner SN
    Am J Manag Care; 2005 Dec; 11(12):781-5. PubMed ID: 16336062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiologist and Sonographer Interpretation Discrepancies for Biliary Sonographic Findings: Our Experience.
    Dawkins A; George N; Ganesh H; Ayoob A; Lee J; Nair R; Kiper C; Duncan K; Stevens S
    Ultrasound Q; 2017 Dec; 33(4):261-264. PubMed ID: 28399070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports.
    Plumb AA; Grieve FM; Khan SH
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Apr; 64(4):386-94; 395-6. PubMed ID: 19264183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of reporting of intravenous urograms: a comparison of radiographers with radiology specialist registrars.
    Bradley AJ; Rajashanker B; Atkinson SL; Kennedy JN; Purcell RS
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Jul; 60(7):807-11. PubMed ID: 15978892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound.
    Bates JA; Conlon RM; Irving HC
    Clin Radiol; 1994 Sep; 49(9):617-20. PubMed ID: 7955888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Natural language processing using online analytic processing for assessing recommendations in radiology reports.
    Dang PA; Kalra MK; Blake MA; Schultz TJ; Stout M; Lemay PR; Freshman DJ; Halpern EF; Dreyer KJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 18312968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of an independent, radiographer-led community diagnostic ultrasound service provided to general practitioners.
    Pallan M; Linnane J; Ramaiah S
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2005 Jun; 27(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 15749720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographers and radiologists reporting plain radiograph requests from accident and emergency and general practice.
    Brealey SD; King DG; Hahn S; Crowe M; Williams P; Rutter P; Crane S
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 16038699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target.
    Johnson AJ; Ying J; Swan JS; Williams LS; Applegate KE; Littenberg B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):497-505. PubMed ID: 17411639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An audit of a radiographer based ultrasound service.
    Weston MJ; Morse A; Slack NF
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):665-7. PubMed ID: 8062007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
    Lee JK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary reports in the emergency department: is a subspecialist radiologist more accurate than a radiology resident?
    Branstetter BF; Morgan MB; Nesbit CE; Phillips JA; Lionetti DM; Chang PJ; Towers JD
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 17236993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department.
    Cavagna E; Berletti R; Schiavon F; Scarsi B; Barbato G
    Radiol Med; 2003 Mar; 105(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 12835644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers.
    Bosmans JM; Weyler JJ; Parizel PM
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):354-8. PubMed ID: 18667286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.