216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20074324)
1. A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint.
Achten J; Parsons NR; Edlin RP; Griffin DR; Costa ML
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 Jan; 11():8. PubMed ID: 20074324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial.
Costa ML; Achten J; Parsons NR; Edlin RP; Foguet P; Prakash U; Griffin DR;
BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2147. PubMed ID: 22517930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of hip function and quality of life of total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint at 5 years.
Costa ML; Achten J; Foguet P; Parsons NR;
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e018849. PubMed ID: 29530907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Warwick patellofemoral arthroplasty trial: a randomised clinical trial of total knee arthroplasty versus patellofemoral arthroplasty in patients with severe arthritis of the patellofemoral joint.
Odumenya M; McGuinness K; Achten J; Parsons N; Spalding T; Costa M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Nov; 12():265. PubMed ID: 22111771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing.
Beaulé PE; Harvey N; Zaragoza E; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17259408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Femoral neck narrowing following hip resurfacing using posterior and Ganz approaches at two years.
Deans VM; Ho KW; Prakash U; Parsons N; Griffin DR; Foguet P
Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 21948029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty - review of comparative clinical and basic science studies.
Marker DR; Strimbu K; McGrath MS; Zywiel MG; Mont MA
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 19583538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of outcome measures and complication rates following three different approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
Talia AJ; Coetzee C; Tirosh O; Tran P
Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):13. PubMed ID: 29310681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequent femoral neck osteolysis with Birmingham mid-head resection resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients.
Asaad A; Hart A; Khoo MM; Ilo K; Schaller G; Black JD; Muirhead-Allwood S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3770-8. PubMed ID: 25981716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip in osteopetrosis.
Girard J; Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Roy AG
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):818-21. PubMed ID: 16720780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Equal Primary Fixation of Resurfacing Stem, but Inferior Cup Fixation With Anterolateral vs Posterior Surgical Approach. A 2-Year Blinded Randomized Radiostereometric and Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Study of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
Hjorth MH; Lorenzen ND; Søballe K; Jakobsen SS; Stilling M
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3412-3420. PubMed ID: 28641972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Better early functional outcome after short stem total hip arthroplasty? A prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial comparing the Collum Femoris Preserving stem with a Zweymuller straight cementless stem total hip replacement for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip.
van Oldenrijk J; Scholtes VAB; van Beers LWAH; Geerdink CH; Niers BBAM; Runne W; Bhandari M; Poolman RW;
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e014522. PubMed ID: 29042371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplasty.
Hamilton DF; Ohly NE; Gaston P
Trials; 2018 Apr; 19(1):226. PubMed ID: 29661229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative Joint Space Width Predicts Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients.
Stambough JB; Xiong A; Baca GR; Wu N; Callaghan JJ; Clohisy JC
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Feb; 31(2):429-33. PubMed ID: 26410552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hip Resurfacing Implants.
Cadossi M; Tedesco G; Sambri A; Mazzotti A; Giannini S
Orthopedics; 2015 Aug; 38(8):504-9. PubMed ID: 26270748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing.
McBryde CW; Theivendran K; Thomas AM; Treacy RB; Pynsent PB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jan; 92(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 20048102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength. A prospective cohort study of 222 patients.
Mahmood SS; Mukka SS; Crnalic S; Wretenberg P; Sayed-Noor AS
Acta Orthop; 2016 Feb; 87(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26471772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
