239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20074359)
1. Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements.
Gatehouse PD; Rolf MP; Graves MJ; Hofman MB; Totman J; Werner B; Quest RA; Liu Y; von Spiczak J; Dieringer M; Firmin DN; van Rossum A; Lombardi M; Schwitter J; Schulz-Menger J; Kilner PJ
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 20074359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical impact of phase offset errors and different correction methods in cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging: a multi-scanner study.
Minderhoud SCS; van der Velde N; Wentzel JJ; van der Geest RJ; Attrach M; Wielopolski PA; Budde RPJ; Helbing WA; Roos-Hesselink JW; Hirsch A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Sep; 22(1):68. PubMed ID: 32938483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-vivo validation of interpolation-based phase offset correction in cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow quantification: a multi-vendor, multi-center study.
Hofman MBM; Rodenburg MJA; Markenroth Bloch K; Werner B; Westenberg JJM; Valsangiacomo Buechel ER; Nijveldt R; Spruijt OA; Kilner PJ; van Rossum AC; Gatehouse PD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 May; 21(1):30. PubMed ID: 31104632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of protocol choice on phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance flow measurement in the ascending aorta: breath-hold and non-breath-hold.
Bolen MA; Setser RM; Gabriel RS; Renapurkar RD; Tandon Y; Lieber ML; Desai MY; Flamm SD
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 22527258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sequence optimization to reduce velocity offsets in cardiovascular magnetic resonance volume flow quantification--a multi-vendor study.
Rolf MP; Hofman MB; Gatehouse PD; Markenroth-Bloch K; Heymans MW; Ebbers T; Graves MJ; Totman JJ; Werner B; van Rossum AC; Kilner PJ; Heethaar RM
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Mar; 13(1):18. PubMed ID: 21388521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multi-center inter-manufacturer study of the temporal stability of phase-contrast velocity mapping background offset errors.
Gatehouse PD; Rolf MP; Bloch KM; Graves MJ; Kilner PJ; Firmin DN; Hofman MB
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Oct; 14(1):72. PubMed ID: 23083397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising.
Kilner PJ; Gatehouse PD; Firmin DN
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(4):723-8. PubMed ID: 17613655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Baseline correction of phase-contrast images in congenital cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Holland BJ; Printz BF; Lai WW
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Mar; 12(1):11. PubMed ID: 20205725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac 4D phase-contrast CMR at 9.4 T using self-gated ultra-short echo time (UTE) imaging.
Krämer M; Motaal AG; Herrmann KH; Löffler B; Reichenbach JR; Strijkers GJ; Hoerr V
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):39. PubMed ID: 28359292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels.
Chernobelsky A; Shubayev O; Comeau CR; Wolff SD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 17578724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regional assessment of carotid artery pulse wave velocity using compressed sensing accelerated high temporal resolution 2D CINE phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Peper ES; Strijkers GJ; Gazzola K; Potters WV; Motaal AG; Luirink IK; Hutten BA; Wiegman A; van Ooij P; van den Born BH; Nederveen AJ; Coolen BF
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Dec; 20(1):86. PubMed ID: 30567566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic correction of background phase offset in 4D-flow of great vessels and of the heart in MRI using a third-order surface model.
Craiem D; Pascaner AF; Casciaro ME; Gencer U; Alcibar J; Soulat G; Mousseaux E
MAGMA; 2019 Dec; 32(6):629-642. PubMed ID: 31230182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multidimensional fetal flow imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a feasibility study.
Goolaub DS; Roy CW; Schrauben E; Sussman D; Marini D; Seed M; Macgowan CK
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Nov; 20(1):77. PubMed ID: 30486832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Required temporal resolution for accurate thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity measurements by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with clinical standard applanation tonometry.
Dorniak K; Heiberg E; Hellmann M; Rawicz-Zegrzda D; Wesierska M; Galaska R; Sabisz A; Szurowska E; Dudziak M; Hedström E
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16(1):110. PubMed ID: 27387199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived coronary wave intensity analysis.
Raphael CE; Keegan J; Parker KH; Simpson R; Collinson J; Vassiliou V; Wage R; Drivas P; Strain S; Cooper R; de Silva R; Stables RH; Di Mario C; Frenneaux M; Pennell DJ; Davies JE; Hughes AD; Firmin D; Prasad SK
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Dec; 18(1):93. PubMed ID: 27964736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of mitral regurgitation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using aortic and pulmonary flow data: impacts of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and different left ventricular segmentation methods.
Śpiewak M; Kłopotowski M; Gawor M; Kubik A; Kowalik E; Miłosz-Wieczorek B; Dąbrowski M; Werys K; Mazurkiewicz Ł; Kożuch K; Polańska-Skrzypczyk M; Petryka-Mazurkiewicz J; Klisiewicz A; Bilińska ZT; Grzybowski J; Witkowski A; Marczak M
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Dec; 19(1):105. PubMed ID: 29268761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved accuracy in flow mapping of congenital heart disease using stationary phantom technique.
Miller TA; Landes AB; Moran AM
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2009 Dec; 11(1):52. PubMed ID: 20003318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning derived segmentation of phase velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance for fully automated aortic flow quantification.
Bratt A; Kim J; Pollie M; Beecy AN; Tehrani NH; Codella N; Perez-Johnston R; Palumbo MC; Alakbarli J; Colizza W; Drexler IR; Azevedo CF; Kim RJ; Devereux RB; Weinsaft JW
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 30612574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atlas-based analysis of 4D flow CMR: automated vessel segmentation and flow quantification.
Bustamante M; Petersson S; Eriksson J; Alehagen U; Dyverfeldt P; Carlhäll CJ; Ebbers T
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Oct; 17():87. PubMed ID: 26438074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of mitral regurgitation by velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
Fujita N; Chazouilleres AF; Hartiala JJ; O'Sullivan M; Heidenreich P; Kaplan JD; Sakuma H; Foster E; Caputo GR; Higgins CB
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 23(4):951-8. PubMed ID: 8106701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
