These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20076870)

  • 1. [A randomized comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of uterine prolapse using polypropylene mesh: hysteropexy versus hysterectomy].
    Carramão S; Auge AP; Pacetta AM; Duarte E; Ayrosa P; Lemos NL; Aoki T
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2009 Feb; 36(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 20076870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Laparoscopic Y-shaped polypropylene mesh for uterine and vaginal vault prolapse].
    Li M; Feng Y; Jin S; Yu D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1106-9. PubMed ID: 24279025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transvaginal polypropylene mesh versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of uterine prolapse: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Lopes ED; Lemos NL; Carramão Sda S; Lunardelli JL; Ruano JM; Aoki T; Auge AP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Apr; 21(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 19936588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
    Han JS; Zhang K; Zhu FL; Yao Y; Liang HM; Zhou LF; Guo HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21426766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polypropylene mesh vs. site-specific repair in the treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Lunardelli JL; Auge AP; Lemos NL; Carramão Sda S; de Oliveira AL; Duarte E; Aoki T
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2009 Jul; 36(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 20076900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and outcome of anterior vaginal wall repair using polypropylene mesh (Gynemesh).
    Jo H; Kim JW; Park NH; Kang SB; Lee HP; Song YS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):700-4. PubMed ID: 17845333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
    Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
    Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B
    Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-year outcomes of a suture-less laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy using polypropylene Y-mesh grafts and fibrin sealant spray: A prospective comparative study.
    Tsai CP; Kao HF; Liu CK; Shen PS; Chen MJ; Hung MJ
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2020 May; 83(5):484-490. PubMed ID: 31904661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No mesh versus mesh in the treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: prospective, randomised, controlled trial, long-term follow-up.
    Tamanini JTN; Reis LO; da Mota Tamanini MM; Aquino Castro R; Sartori MGF; Girão MJBC
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Oct; 52(10):1839-1844. PubMed ID: 32440838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vaginal reconstructive surgery for severe pelvic organ prolapses: a 'uterine-sparing' technique using polypropylene prostheses.
    De Vita D; Araco F; Gravante G; Sesti F; Piccione E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 18321633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Application of unabsorbable polypropylene mesh in patients with vaginal prolapse after hysterectomy].
    Daniłoś J; Stachowicz N; Kotarski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 May; 74(5):384-6. PubMed ID: 12931466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy.
    Culligan PJ; Blackwell L; Goldsmith LJ; Graham CA; Rogers A; Heit MH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 15994614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.