BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20077251)

  • 1. Statistical methods for assessment of biosimilarity using biomarker data.
    Chow SC; Lu Q; Tse SK; Chi E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):90-105. PubMed ID: 20077251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of moment-based and probability-based criteria for assessment of follow-on biologics.
    Chow SC; Hsieh TC; Chi E; Yang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 20077247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical test for evaluation of biosimilarity in variability of follow-on biologics.
    Hsieh TC; Chow SC; Liu JP; Hsiao CF; Chi E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 20077250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical assessment of biosimilar products.
    Chow SC; Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):10-30. PubMed ID: 20077246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing bioequivalence using genomic data.
    Chow SC; Shao J; Li L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 15587969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparability and biosimilarity: considerations for the healthcare provider.
    Lee JF; Litten JB; Grampp G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Jun; 28(6):1053-8. PubMed ID: 22519391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing generic and innovator drugs: a review of 12 years of bioequivalence data from the United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Davit BM; Nwakama PE; Buehler GJ; Conner DP; Haidar SH; Patel DT; Yang Y; Yu LX; Woodcock J
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Oct; 43(10):1583-97. PubMed ID: 19776300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency estimator for assessing of follow-on biologics.
    Lu Y; Zhang ZZ; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1280-97. PubMed ID: 25072640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific considerations for assessing biosimilar products.
    Chow SC; Wang J; Endrenyi L; Lachenbruch PA
    Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 22933240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evaluation of biosimilarity index based on reproducibility probability for assessing follow-on biologics.
    Hsieh TC; Chow SC; Yang LY; Chi E
    Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 22899403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonparametric tests for evaluation of biosimilarity in variability of follow-on biologics.
    Zhang N; Yang J; Chow SC; Chi E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1239-53. PubMed ID: 25036940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supplemental applications proposing labeling changes for approved drugs, biologics, and medical devices. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(164):49603-10. PubMed ID: 18958946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The scope and requirements related to preclinical and clinical studies of a new medicinal product, including biotechnological and biosimilar products.
    Brodniewicz-Proba T
    Acta Pol Pharm; 2008; 65(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 19172845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Requirements for submission of bioequivalence data; final rule. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2009 Jan; 74(11):2849-62. PubMed ID: 19385107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical assessment of biosimilarity based on relative distance between follow-on biologics.
    Kang SH; Chow SC
    Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(3):382-92. PubMed ID: 22941672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. United States Food and Drug Administration requirements for approval of generic drug products.
    Meyer MC
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2001; 62 Suppl 5():4-9; discussion 23-4. PubMed ID: 11305846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New drug, antibiotic, and biological drug product regulations; accelerated approval--FDA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1992 Dec; 57(239):58942-60. PubMed ID: 10123232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lessons learned from independent central review.
    Ford R; Schwartz L; Dancey J; Dodd LE; Eisenhauer EA; Gwyther S; Rubinstein L; Sargent D; Shankar L; Therasse P; Verweij J
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):268-74. PubMed ID: 19101138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An overview of the FDA publication Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.
    Knoben JE; Scott GR; Tonelli RJ
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Dec; 47(12):2696-700. PubMed ID: 2278285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating statistical methods to establish clinical similarity of two biologics.
    Lei L; Olson K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 20077249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.