These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20077253)

  • 1. Adaptive Bayesian design for phase I dose-finding trials using a joint model of response and toxicity.
    Wang M; Day R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):125-44. PubMed ID: 20077253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.
    Yin G; Li Y; Ji Y
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):777-84. PubMed ID: 16984320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals.
    Ji Y; Li Y; Nebiyou Bekele B
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 17715248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control.
    Tighiouart M; Rogatko A; Babb JS
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2183-96. PubMed ID: 15909291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choice of designs and doses for early phase trials.
    Zhou Y
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 18(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 15147290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.
    Bekele BN; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 16011680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phase I (or phase II) dose-ranging clinical trials: proposal of a two-stage Bayesian design.
    Zohar S; Chevret S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 12635905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials.
    Gönen M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 15837436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive designs for Phase I dose-finding studies.
    Zhou Y
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 19703268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An adaptive dose-finding approach for correlated bivariate binary and continuous outcomes in phase I oncology trials.
    Hirakawa A
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(6):516-32. PubMed ID: 22108785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian decision procedures for dose-escalation based on evidence of undesirable events and therapeutic benefit.
    Whitehead J; Zhou Y; Stevens J; Blakey G; Price J; Leadbetter J
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 16342336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal designs for estimating the most successful dose.
    Zohar S; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4311-20. PubMed ID: 16969893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An optimization algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials.
    Jiang H; Liu Y; Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 17681867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dose-cohort designs in cancer phase I trials.
    Huang B; Chappell R
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2070-93. PubMed ID: 17764082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs: illustrations and practical considerations.
    Thall PF; Cook JD; Estey EH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):623-38. PubMed ID: 17037262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian dose finding design for dual endpoint phase I trials.
    Loke YC; Tan SB; Cai Y; Machin D
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16013039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian population modeling of phase I dose escalation studies: Gaussian process versus parametric approaches.
    Russu A; Poggesi I; Gomeni R; De Nicolao G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 58(11):3156-64. PubMed ID: 21846598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian population approaches to the analysis of dose escalation studies.
    Russu A; De Nicolao G; Poggesi I; Neve M; Gomeni R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 21764475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.
    Zhang W; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar S
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2365-83. PubMed ID: 16220478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
    Paoletti X; Kramar A
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.