These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The value of customised centiles in assessing perinatal mortality risk associated with parity and maternal size. Gardosi J; Clausson B; Francis A BJOG; 2009 Sep; 116(10):1356-63. PubMed ID: 19538413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should parity be included in customised fetal weight standards for identifying small-for-gestational-age babies? Results from a French multicentre study. Ego A; Subtil D; Grange G; Thiebaugeorges O; Senat MV; Vayssiere C; Zeitlin J BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1256-64. PubMed ID: 18715411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth. Gardosi J; Figueras F; Clausson B; Francis A Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 25(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 21133964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small for gestational age neonates--are we missing some by only using standard population growth standards and does it matter? Narchi H; Skinner A; Williams B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19565425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of birth weight and weight/length ratio for gestation as correlates of perinatal morbidity. Williams MC; O'Brien WF J Perinatol; 1997; 17(5):346-50. PubMed ID: 9373837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: Customised fetal weight: centile charts or tables? Hutchon DJ Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Apr; 46(2):172-3; author reply 173-4. PubMed ID: 16638047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality. Zhang X; Platt RW; Cnattingius S; Joseph KS; Kramer MS BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):474-7. PubMed ID: 17378820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods. Ariyuki Y; Hata T; Kitao M Pediatrics; 1995 Jul; 96(1 Pt 1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7596719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Fetal growth from the AUDIPOG study. II. Application for the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation]. Mamelle N; Munoz F; Martin JL; Laumon B; Grandjean H J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 8901305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An investigation into the applicability of customised charts for the assessment of fetal growth in antenatal population at Blackburn, Lancashire, UK. Dua A; Schram C J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):411-3. PubMed ID: 16846865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired? Ehrenkranz RA Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2007 May; 92(3):F161-2. PubMed ID: 17449851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Fetal growth in multiple pregnancy]. Schlembach D Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 17440265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal brain to liver weight ratio as a measure of intrauterine growth retardation: analysis of 182 stillborn autopsies. Mitchell ML Mod Pathol; 2001 Jan; 14(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11211305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current growth standards, definitions, diagnosis and classification of fetal growth retardation. Bakketeig LS Eur J Clin Nutr; 1998 Jan; 52 Suppl 1():S1-4. PubMed ID: 9511013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]