These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20079897)

  • 1. A randomized controlled study comparing carbon dioxide versus normal saline as distension media in diagnostic office hysteroscopy: is the distension with carbon dioxide a problem?
    Raimondo G; Raimondo D; D'Aniello G; Russo C; Ronga A; Gabbanini M; Filippeschi M; Petraglia F; Florio P
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Nov; 94(6):2319-22. PubMed ID: 20079897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Office vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile women: effects of gynecologist experience, instrument size, and distention medium on patient discomfort.
    Pluchino N; Ninni F; Angioni S; Artini P; Araujo VG; Massimetti G; Genazzani AR; Cela V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 20417426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carbon dioxide in office diagnostic hysteroscopy: An open question. A multicenter randomized trial on 1982 procedures.
    Tagliaferri V; Ricciardi L; Ricciardi R; Pinto LR; Lanzone A; Scambia G; Guido M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():97-101. PubMed ID: 30287097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of carbon dioxide and normal saline for uterine distension in outpatient hysteroscopy.
    Nagele F; Bournas N; O'Connor H; Broadbent M; Richardson R; Magos A
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Feb; 65(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 8566253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomised comparison of distension media for outpatient hysteroscopy.
    Shankar M; Davidson A; Taub N; Habiba M
    BJOG; 2004 Jan; 111(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 14687053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as a uterine distension medium for diagnostic vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
    Pellicano M; Guida M; Zullo F; Lavitola G; Cirillo D; Nappi C
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Feb; 79(2):418-21. PubMed ID: 12568856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Craciunas L; Sajid MS; Howell R
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1709-14.e1-4. PubMed ID: 24011611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline in outpatient hysteroscopy.
    Litta P; Bonora M; Pozzan C; Merlin F; Sacco G; Fracas M; Capobianco G; Dessole S
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Nov; 18(11):2446-9. PubMed ID: 14585899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selecting distending medium for out-patient hysteroscopy. Does it really matter?
    Paschopoulos M; Kaponis A; Makrydimas G; Zikopoulos K; Alamanos Y; O'Donovan P; Paraskevaidis E
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2619-25. PubMed ID: 15459167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Practicability of panoramic hysteroscopy with CO2. Clinical experience: 923 cases].
    Busquets M; Lemus M
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1993; 58(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8209037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of carbon dioxide versus normal saline for diagnostic hysteroscopy.
    Brusco GF; Arena S; Angelini A
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Apr; 79(4):993-7. PubMed ID: 12749443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysteroscopic dissemination of endometrial carcinoma using carbon dioxide and normal saline: a retrospective study.
    Lo KW; Cheung TH; Yim SF; Chung TK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Mar; 84(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 11855876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endometrial cell dissemination at diagnostic hysteroscopy: a prospective randomized cross-over comparison of normal saline and carbon dioxide uterine distension.
    Nagele F; Wieser F; Deery A; Hart R; Magos A
    Hum Reprod; 1999 Nov; 14(11):2739-42. PubMed ID: 10548613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Office hysteroscopy and adenomyosis.
    Molinas CR; Campo R
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):557-67. PubMed ID: 16554185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term complications of office hysteroscopy: analysis of 1028 cases.
    van Kerkvoorde TC; Veersema S; Timmermans A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):494-7. PubMed ID: 22564927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysteroscopy: a technique for all? Analysis of 5,000 outpatient hysteroscopies.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A; Taylor A; Tsirkas P; Mastrogamvrakis G; Sharma M; Magos A
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 17482613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Six thousand office diagnostic-operative hysteroscopies.
    Perez-Medina T; Bajo JM; Martinez-Cortes L; Castellanos P; Perez de Avila I
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Oct; 71(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 11044539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pain in diagnostic hysteroscopy: a multivariate analysis after a randomized, controlled trial.
    Mazzon I; Favilli A; Grasso M; Horvath S; Bini V; Di Renzo GC; Gerli S
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1398-403. PubMed ID: 25241369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Office hysteroscopy: comparison of 2.7- and 4-mm hysteroscopes for acceptability, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy.
    Rullo S; Sorrenti G; Marziali M; Ermini B; Sesti F; Piccione E
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Jan; 50(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15730173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Vaginoscopic hysteroscopy].
    Agostini A; Crochet P; Blanc K; Collette E; Cravello L; Blanc B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 May; 34(5):420-2. PubMed ID: 16690342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.