These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20080025)

  • 21. Neural surprise in somatosensory Bayesian learning.
    Gijsen S; Grundei M; Lange RT; Ostwald D; Blankenburg F
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1008068. PubMed ID: 33529181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Faces and text attract gaze independent of the task: Experimental data and computer model.
    Cerf M; Frady EP; Koch C
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):10.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digit eyes: Learning-related changes in information access in a computer game parallel those of oculomotor attention in laboratory studies.
    McColeman C; Thompson J; Anvari N; Azmand SJ; Barnes J; Barrett RCA; Byliris R; Chen Y; Dolguikh K; Fischler K; Harrison S; Hayre RS; Poe R; Swanson L; Tracey T; Volkanov A; Woodruff C; Zhang R; Blair M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2434-2447. PubMed ID: 32333371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electroencephalographic correlates of temporal Bayesian belief updating and surprise.
    Visalli A; Capizzi M; Ambrosini E; Kopp B; Vallesi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117867. PubMed ID: 33592246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing the neural basis of uncertainty in perceptual category learning through varying levels of distortion.
    Daniel R; Wagner G; Koch K; Reichenbach JR; Sauer H; Schlösser RG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1781-93. PubMed ID: 20617884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The surprise-attention link: a review.
    Horstmann G
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():106-15. PubMed ID: 25682693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variational learning and bits-back coding: an information-theoretic view to Bayesian learning.
    Honkela A; Valpola H
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2004 Jul; 15(4):800-10. PubMed ID: 15461074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye movements during transitive action observation have sequential structure.
    Webb A; Knott A; Macaskill MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 19854431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task-induced neural covariability as a signature of approximate Bayesian learning and inference.
    Lange RD; Haefner RM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1009557. PubMed ID: 35259152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning to Model Task-Oriented Attention.
    Zou X; Zhao X; Wang J; Yang Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():2381451. PubMed ID: 27247561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.
    Brodersen KH; Penny WD; Harrison LM; Daunizeau J; Ruff CC; Duzel E; Friston KJ; Stephan KE
    Neural Netw; 2008 Nov; 21(9):1247-60. PubMed ID: 18835129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Where to look next? Eye movements reduce local uncertainty.
    Renninger LW; Verghese P; Coughlan J
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(3):6. PubMed ID: 17461684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adaptive learning via selectionism and Bayesianism, Part I: connection between the two.
    Zhang J
    Neural Netw; 2009 Apr; 22(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 19386469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Object perception as Bayesian inference.
    Kersten D; Mamassian P; Yuille A
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2004; 55():271-304. PubMed ID: 14744217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal and human eye movements to clustered low value cues to increase decision rewards during search.
    Eckstein MP; Schoonveld W; Zhang S; Mack SC; Akbas E
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt B):137-54. PubMed ID: 26093154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Confusion of fear and surprise: a test of the perceptual-attentional limitation hypothesis with eye movement monitoring.
    Roy-Charland A; Perron M; Beaudry O; Eady K
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(7):1214-22. PubMed ID: 24460373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fusion of visual and auditory stimuli during saccades: a Bayesian explanation for perisaccadic distortions.
    Binda P; Bruno A; Burr DC; Morrone MC
    J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 27(32):8525-32. PubMed ID: 17687030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A computational visual saliency model based on statistics and machine learning.
    Lin RJ; Lin WS
    J Vis; 2014 Aug; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 25084782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How does image noise affect actual and predicted human gaze allocation in assessing image quality?
    Röhrbein F; Goddard P; Schneider M; James G; Guo K
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():11-25. PubMed ID: 25982711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.