These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20080212)

  • 1. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo.
    Rüger M; Gensior TJ; Herren C; von Walter M; Ocklenburg C; Marx R; Erli HJ
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2852-61. PubMed ID: 20080212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
    Fawzy AS; Amer MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
    Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone.
    Sul YT; Kang BS; Johansson C; Um HS; Park CJ; Albrektsson T
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 18470920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biology of grit-blasted titanium alloy implants.
    Goldberg VM; Stevenson S; Feighan J; Davy D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):122-9. PubMed ID: 7554621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
    Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
    Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Torsional stability of HA-coated and grit-blasted titanium dental implants.
    Cook SD; Baffes GC; Palafox AJ; Wolfe MW; Burgess A
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 1298818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants.
    Cooper LF; Zhou Y; Takebe J; Guo J; Abron A; Holmén A; Ellingsen JE
    Biomaterials; 2006 Feb; 27(6):926-36. PubMed ID: 16112191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
    Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment on titanium implant osseointegration in ovariectomized rats.
    Li Y; Zou S; Wang D; Feng G; Bao C; Hu J
    Biomaterials; 2010 Apr; 31(12):3266-73. PubMed ID: 20132983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition.
    Thomas KA; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Oct; 19(8):875-901. PubMed ID: 3880349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of pores created by laser superfinishing on osseointegration of titanium alloy implants.
    Stangl R; Pries A; Loos B; Müller M; Erben RG
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):444-53. PubMed ID: 15127391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model.
    Feighan JE; Goldberg VM; Davy D; Parr JA; Stevenson S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Sep; 77(9):1380-95. PubMed ID: 7673290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
    Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The biocompatibility of SLA-treated titanium implants.
    Kim H; Choi SH; Ryu JJ; Koh SY; Park JH; Lee IS
    Biomed Mater; 2008 Jun; 3(2):025011. PubMed ID: 18458368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces: an experimental study in rabbits.
    Salou L; Hoornaert A; Louarn G; Layrolle P
    Acta Biomater; 2015 Jan; 11():494-502. PubMed ID: 25449926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.