These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20080506)

  • 1. A censored beta mixture model for the estimation of the proportion of non-differentially expressed genes.
    Markitsis A; Lai Y
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 26(5):640-6. PubMed ID: 20080506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An efficient concordant integrative analysis of multiple large-scale two-sample expression data sets.
    Lai Y; Zhang F; Nayak TK; Modarres R; Lee NH; McCaffrey TA
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 33(23):3852-3860. PubMed ID: 28174897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
    Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mixture-model based estimation of gene expression variance from public database improves identification of differentially expressed genes in small sized microarray data.
    Kim M; Cho SB; Kim JH
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 26(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 20015947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Filtering for increased power for microarray data analysis.
    Hackstadt AJ; Hess AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():11. PubMed ID: 19133141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian mixture model based clustering of replicated microarray data.
    Medvedovic M; Yeung KY; Bumgarner RE
    Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 20(8):1222-32. PubMed ID: 14871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ensemble approach to microarray data-based gene prioritization after missing value imputation.
    Hua D; Lai Y
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 17267438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A statistical method for estimating the proportion of differentially expressed genes.
    Lai Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Jun; 30(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 16650806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving false discovery rate estimation.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 20(11):1737-45. PubMed ID: 14988112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mixture model approach to sample size estimation in two-sample comparative microarray experiments.
    Jørstad TS; Midelfart H; Bones AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():117. PubMed ID: 18298817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A classification approach for DNA methylation profiling with bisulfite next-generation sequencing data.
    Cheng L; Zhu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 30(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24273245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SLIM: a sliding linear model for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in datasets with dependence structures.
    Wang HQ; Tuominen LK; Tsai CJ
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 27(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 21098430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mixture model approach to the tests of concordance and discordance between two large-scale experiments with two-sample groups.
    Lai Y; Adam BL; Podolsky R; She JX
    Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 23(10):1243-50. PubMed ID: 17384018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical methods for ranking differentially expressed genes.
    Broberg P
    Genome Biol; 2003; 4(6):R41. PubMed ID: 12801415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A generalized likelihood ratio test to identify differentially expressed genes from microarray data.
    Wang S; Ethier S
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14693815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.