These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20081161)

  • 1. Exploring the temporal dynamics of social facilitation in the Stroop task.
    Sharma D; Booth R; Brown R; Huguet P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20081161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.
    Caldas AL; Machado-Pinheiro W; Daneyko O; Riggio L
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1815-1828. PubMed ID: 31030272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social presence effects in the Stroop task: further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation.
    Huguet P; Galvaing MP; Monteil JM; Dumas F
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1999 Nov; 77(5):1011-25. PubMed ID: 10573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.
    Roelofs A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 19963201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual but not fragile: individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation.
    Kalanthroff E; Henik A
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 23416541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonconcurrently presented auditory tones reduce distraction.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):714-9. PubMed ID: 21264700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fronto-temporal brain activity and connectivity track implicit attention to positive and negative social words in a novel socio-emotional Stroop task.
    Arioli M; Basso G; Poggi P; Canessa N
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117580. PubMed ID: 33221447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
    Khng KH; Lee K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101356. PubMed ID: 24992683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Threat Interference Biases Predict Socially Anxious Behavior: The Role of Inhibitory Control and Minute of Stressor.
    Gorlin EI; Teachman BA
    Behav Ther; 2015 Jul; 46(4):493-509. PubMed ID: 26163713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute alcohol does not impair attentional inhibition as measured with Stroop interference scores but impairs Stroop performance.
    Riedel P; Wolff M; Spreer M; Petzold J; Plawecki MH; Goschke T; Zimmermann US; Smolka MN
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Jun; 238(6):1593-1607. PubMed ID: 33660080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct neural substrates underlying target facilitation and distractor suppression: A combined voxel-based morphometry and resting-state functional connectivity study.
    Xie K; Jin Z; Ni X; Zhang J; Li L
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117149. PubMed ID: 32659355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A; Rabeling-Keus IM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Oct; 38(7):893-904. PubMed ID: 20921102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active inhibition of a distractor word: the distractor precue benefit in the Stroop color-naming task.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):799-812. PubMed ID: 21480743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Stroop Task Sex Difference: Evolved Inhibition or Color Naming?
    Sjoberg EA; Wilner RG; D'Souza A; Cole GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jan; 52(1):315-323. PubMed ID: 36261735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two distinct patterns of interference in between-attribute Stroop matching tasks.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):563-581. PubMed ID: 27981523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings.
    Starreveld PA; La Heij W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):721-733. PubMed ID: 27714665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity.
    Portugal ACA; Afonso AS; Caldas AL; Maturana W; Mocaiber I; Machado-Pinheiro W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():234-243. PubMed ID: 30343096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.