173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20081576)
1. Effects of biofilm treatments on the multi-species Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model.
Dowd SE; Sun Y; Smith E; Kennedy JP; Jones CE; Wolcott R
J Wound Care; 2009 Dec; 18(12):508, 510-12. PubMed ID: 20081576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multispecies biofilm in an artificial wound bed--A novel model for in vitro assessment of solid antimicrobial dressings.
Kucera J; Sojka M; Pavlik V; Szuszkiewicz K; Velebny V; Klein P
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Aug; 103():18-24. PubMed ID: 24880129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of biofilm-targeted antimicrobial wound dressing for the treatment of chronic wound infections.
Ng SF; Leow HL
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2015; 41(11):1902-9. PubMed ID: 25758412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro multispecies Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model.
Sun Y; Dowd SE; Smith E; Rhoads DD; Wolcott RD
Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(6):805-13. PubMed ID: 19128252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Propagation of anaerobic bacteria within an aerobic multi-species chronic wound biofilm model.
Sun Y; Smith E; Wolcott R; Dowd SE
J Wound Care; 2009 Oct; 18(10):426-31. PubMed ID: 19816382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Graphene Oxide affects Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa dual species biofilm in Lubbock Chronic Wound Biofilm model.
Di Giulio M; Di Lodovico S; Fontana A; Traini T; Di Campli E; Pilato S; D'Ercole S; Cellini L
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18525. PubMed ID: 33116164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biofilms in Chronic Wound Infections: Innovative Antimicrobial Approaches Using the In Vitro Lubbock Chronic Wound Biofilm Model.
Diban F; Di Lodovico S; Di Fermo P; D'Ercole S; D'Arcangelo S; Di Giulio M; Cellini L
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36674518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel in vitro flat-bed perfusion biofilm model for determining the potential antimicrobial efficacy of topical wound treatments.
Thorn RM; Greenman J
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 107(6):2070-9. PubMed ID: 19548886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution and Inhibition of Liposomes on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm.
Dong D; Thomas N; Thierry B; Vreugde S; Prestidge CA; Wormald PJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131806. PubMed ID: 26125555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities.
Hill KE; Malic S; McKee R; Rennison T; Harding KG; Williams DW; Thomas DW
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling antisepsis using defined populations of facultative and anaerobic wound pathogens grown in a basally perfused biofilm model.
Oates A; Lindsay S; Mistry H; Ortega F; McBain AJ
Biofouling; 2018 May; 34(5):507-518. PubMed ID: 29873244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study on the ability of quaternary ammonium groups attached to a polyurethane foam wound dressing to inhibit bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.
Tran PL; Hamood AN; de Souza A; Schultz G; Liesenfeld B; Mehta D; Reid TW
Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 25469865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
van der Plas MJ; Jukema GN; Wai SW; Dogterom-Ballering HC; Lagendijk EL; van Gulpen C; van Dissel JT; Bloemberg GV; Nibbering PH
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jan; 61(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 17965032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A porcine model of skin wound infected with a polybacterial biofilm.
Klein P; Sojka M; Kucera J; Matonohova J; Pavlik V; Nemec J; Kubickova G; Slavkovsky R; Szuszkiewicz K; Danek P; Rozkot M; Velebny V
Biofouling; 2018 Feb; 34(2):226-236. PubMed ID: 29405092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combinatorial effects of antibiotics and enzymes against dual-species Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the wound-like medium.
Fanaei Pirlar R; Emaneini M; Beigverdi R; Banar M; B van Leeuwen W; Jabalameli F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235093. PubMed ID: 32584878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. γ-Alkylidene-γ-lactones and isobutylpyrrol-2(5H)-ones analogues to rubrolides as inhibitors of biofilm formation by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
Pereira UA; Barbosa LC; Maltha CR; Demuner AJ; Masood MA; Pimenta AL
Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2014 Feb; 24(4):1052-6. PubMed ID: 24484899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Efficacy of Tetrasodium EDTA on Biofilms.
Percival SL; Salisbury AM
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1057():101-110. PubMed ID: 29280095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydrogels Containing Antibiofilm and Antimicrobial Agents Beneficial for Biofilm-Associated Wound Infection: Formulation Characterizations and In vitro Study.
Anjum A; Sim CH; Ng SF
AAPS PharmSciTech; 2018 Apr; 19(3):1219-1230. PubMed ID: 29280044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro interaction of chronic wound bacteria in biofilms.
Malic S; Hill KE; Playle R; Thomas DW; Williams DW
J Wound Care; 2011 Dec; 20(12):569-70, 572, 574-7. PubMed ID: 22240883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
